PF review
thalassocrat at nym.hush.com · 01 Dec 2007, 12:26
· from 2007-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: thalassocrat at nym.hush.com (thalassocrat at nym.hush.com) Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:26:21 +1100 Subject: (urth) PF review Message-ID: <20071201122621.7E0FCDA820 at mailserver8.hushmail.com> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:22:18 +1100 paul witcover <gdeonn at yahoo.com> wrote: > > All excellent questions, many of which I continue to puzzle >over! I've been a little disappointed by the critical reception >of this novel so far -- the majority view seems to be that it's a >light-hearted romp, just pure fun, without any of the weightier >issues normally present in his work. It's baffling to me that the >book could be so significantly misapprehended. In fact, isn't it quite clear that Chris is a monster? He sins, wilfully and in complete knowledge of what he is doing. Even when he is given a chance to undo his sinful acts, he rejects it, and instead uses the opportunity to try to ensure he will sin in the same way, again. His confession is worse than worthless. Look: the whole story is supposed to be a kind of confession. No matter how you look at it, there is at least one thing for which he definitely needs the premium-level forgiveness package: the killing of Michet. Assume that everything else can be marked down to circumstances, battle, bad luck, youth, whatever. He killed Michet when Michet was offering him reconciliation, while he was effectively unarmed, and solely to preserve his respect as captain. The Michet killing triggers the whole "confession". He comes back from the past. He can, perhaps, undo Michet. Whether or not he can actually alter the future/past, he has an obvious moral obligation to try to do so. But he wilfully chooses not to try. He does not go to visit himself in Jersey. He obviously plans to act exactly as Ignacio did during his "own" youth, and do everything to ensure that "Chris1" follows exactly the same trajectory as "he" did, so he can take over Novia when "Chris1" goes back to the future. He is going to ensure that his youthful self sins in exactly the same way, so his older self can benefit. He preys not only on others, but also on his own youth. I think Chris is perhaps the most unambiguously evil character Wolfe has presented in a novel. I find it breathtaking. "Sometimes I have had to slip." Maybe, sometimes, but when he came back to the future he had a miraculous chance to try to undo the slips - and he rejected it.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net