Tzadkiel's ship

Jeff Wilson · 03 Dec 2007, 09:44 · from 2007-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:44:15 -0600
Subject: (urth) Tzadkiel's ship
In-Reply-To: <c873c2920711282109x83692cat771f6e6bc8bf6855 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <9a33123d0711280610g2ebe9adbte27022bd9af837ca at mail.gmail.com>	<1718.24.119.55.228.1196282468.squirrel at webmail.io.com>	<1f7617370711281351w3eedf9c8h7ddcaa80e3f1b286 at mail.gmail.com>	<474E45D0.80909 at io.com>
	<c873c2920711282109x83692cat771f6e6bc8bf6855 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4753CFEF.7020503 at io.com>

Mark Millman wrote:
> Dear Mr. Wilson:

>> If "ship" can come to include "rockets and four
>> masters and magical space time machines that
>> traffic with other universes" over millenia, why
>> must "volant" remain fixed in stone? If you insist
>> on strictly historical heraldry, "a ship volant" is
>> as meaningless a device as "a serpent rampant";
>> you can't draw it because historical ships have
>> no wings any more than historical serpents had
>> feet.
> 
> Not so; a ship volant would show no waterline, while a ship natant would.

Pimsley says "natant" means swimming to the right, and applies to fish.

Calling floating "natant" seems as figurative as sailing being called 
"volant".

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
< http://www.io.com/~jwilson >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net