Fuligin invented

gwern0 at gmail.com · 17 Jan 2008, 19:44 · from 2008-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gwern0 at gmail.com (gwern0 at gmail.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:44:15 -0500
Subject: (urth) Fuligin invented
In-Reply-To: <99774192-7E52-47FF-B11B-3F552653CBAB at gmail.com>
References: <E1JFR0z-000L7h-0w at pr-webmail-1.mail.demon.net>
	<4819.72.171.0.143.1200589082.squirrel at www.brunians.org>
	<44fb53d10801171001o31d37e88k47b2a5c6fa017ea2 at mail.gmail.com>
	<99774192-7E52-47FF-B11B-3F552653CBAB at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080117194415.GB19051@localhost>

On 2008.01.17 12:20:21 -0600, Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com> scribbled 2.3K characters:
> I've never heard of an actual mercury channel in a sword. I can ask on
> a swordsmanship forum I frequent (where several smiths post) to see if
> it's feasible. From what I understand of sword structure, it's not.
> You need the center part of the sword to be the strongest part, and
> that usually means it needs to be softer and more ductile than the
> surrounding steel. Cutting a big channel out of the middle of it might
> weaken its structural integrity to the point where it would be useless
> for cutting.

When it was described, the way I thought it was done was like this: swords sometimes have 'blood grooves' (fullers), right? This produces a slight volume down the middle which you could fill up - maybe you could weld a flat strip down the length of the blade, or fold over a section of the blade and create a sealed space that way. To make it symmetrical you could either do the same thing to the other side (if the blade in cross-section kind of looks like an I-beam), or have just a single fuller/mercury-channel. It'd be very tricky to have a good welded channel or to preserve the void while working it in the other method, yes, but it doesn't seem impossible to this layperson. :)

> The idea is that the edges, the parts that need to be sharp, should be
> harder. When steel hardens, it becomes more brittle. Brittle steel
> will sharpen and hold an edge. But it's also weak. If you made the
> whole sword out of really hard steel it would chip and shatter
> whenever it made contact with something. So you make the non-edge part
> of the sword out of softer, more flexible metal so that it will
> actually absorb shock. But cutting a big channel out of the middle
> would remove a lot of the shock-absorbing material.
>
> Lane

I don't think fullers are always cut - <https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fuller_(weapon)> says you could also just press or bend the blade.

--
gwern
Macintosh Fortezza Ortega GAFE Internet Fox WQC wire SLI Gist
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20080117/b21b5d29/attachment.pgp

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net