Graves etc.
thalassocrat at nym.hush.com · 19 Jan 2008, 06:50
· from 2008-January.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: thalassocrat at nym.hush.com (thalassocrat at nym.hush.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:50:42 +1100 Subject: (urth) Graves etc. Message-ID: <20080119065043.3CB431A0039 at mailserver8.hushmail.com> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:24:06 +1100 Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: >sorry roy, hadn't checked my email for a few days. > >Yes, I was about to post something to that effect - >Wolfe is a reader of fiction, and while he researches >his novels, I think we would be surprised to note how >much time he has spent exclusively writing rather than >amassing a huge collection of esoteric and obscure >books that he peruses in his infinite time. > >I think he once told me he hadn't gotten far in War >and Peace, nor read the entirety of Brothers >Karamazov. However, to be fair, he has certainly read >all of Dickens and Proust and Herodotus and >Chesterton, and the other obvious influences. > >But you don't have to have read everything to be a >great creator, eh? Some people seem to think it would have been a good thing if Wolfe had intended to rewrite Graves, Nabokov, Dostoyevsky, Borges, Joyce, Dante, The Green Knight, Parsifal, The Magus etc etc etc. I've never really understood that. Apart from anything else, I get the impression that Wolfe thinks he can do a lot better than most of these supposed models.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net