Seven American Nights Forgery?

Dave Tallman · 07 May 2008, 05:32 · from 2008-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: davetallman at msn.com (Dave Tallman)
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 23:32:35 -0600
Subject: (urth)  Seven American Nights Forgery?
Message-ID: <48213EF3.2080003 at gmail.com>

The story ends with "Do you think this is his handwriting?...Perhaps. 
Perhaps."

And perhaps not. This adds K+1 to the abstraction. Nadan's account is 
already unreliable because of drugs he may have taken, his excisions, 
and other omissions. What if some of the story is forged?  We know the 
museum man has a machine that can forge handwriting, and another that 
can compose stories. It's not implausible that it could do so in Farsi.

Suppose the U.S. government decided that Nadan needed to disappear. They 
might have planted the notebook to lay a false trail for the 
investigator. I don't think the whole thing is forged -- that would be 
too simple of a "closed loop." The notebook is not of American 
manufacture; it wouldn't be so easy to replace the whole thing. But if 
the forging machine can wield a pen it would be easy to add a misleading 
ending.

Where does the forgery begin? The story of the glass of alcohol is 
fishy. Ardis would know that most Muslims don't drink, and could have 
learned from Bobby that Nadan himself doesn't. Knowing this, Nadan 
wouldn't have used that particular ruse. (By the way, the story seems 
like a twisted version of Cupid and Psyche). If my theory is true, the 
government also killed Ardis with his gun. She probably does have a 
deformity but the real Nadan never saw it.

The Easter parade account also looks wrong. A Muslim wouldn't refer to 
Jesus as "the dead leader lifted up," since Jesus is respected as a 
prophet in Islam. This could have been forged in case the paraders 
remembered seeing them. This might have been the last time both were 
seen alive. The costumes for the party were both fairly concealing 
(armor and Egyptian robes), allowing an impersonation there.

Further back than this, the story looks genuine. I believe at least the 
account of the room being searched is real. That's when the government 
agents took a copy of the journal as input for the forging machine. They 
may also have chemically analyzed the remaining eggs and taken the 
hallucinogenic one. They would want Nadan sober for his interrogation.

What was the motive for the abduction? The museum man could well be a 
high-level government agent. The man with no lower jaw may have let slip 
a major rumor when he said "Someday we are great again." Given the way 
he talks, there's no phonetic difference between that and "Sunday we are 
great again." Perhaps a big forgery was planned for Easter Sunday that 
could change the fortunes of fallen America.

If so, the appearance of the museum man at the play was no coincidence. 
He followed Nadan there and pumped him to see what he knew. A few days 
later, someone decided that Nadan knew too much...

Does the forgery account for a missing day? I doubt it. Computers can at 
least count. I count seven full days if the first day of sightseeing 
went north but not all the way to the ruined capital buildings. There 
are a few hints that this is the case:

1) Writing with closed shutters and a candle (p. 340, Orb edition of 
IODDAOSAOS). Something outside beating on the shutters (A wild animal? 
Moths?) seems to indicate late at night. On the day he visits the ruins, 
he opens the shutters and the sun is just setting.

2) He's fearful and homesick that first day. The second day he's brave 
enough to go out to a restaurant and to the theater at night.

3) His attitude about going to the park changes. On p. 339 he wants to 
postpone it until he has seen other things. On p. 344 he is ashamed he 
didn't go that day. This seems more likely if they are two different days.

4) He says he spent the whole day at the ruins on p. 347. The other day 
mentions sleeping late, listening to musicians, and people-watching. His 
first writing for that day is at about 4:30pm (midnight Iran time with 
local daylight savings time p. 338) back in his room, which doesn't 
allow that much time for ruin explorations.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net