Islands in Commonwealth; other Cerberus book

adam louis stephanides · 05 Jul 1998, 13:57 · from urth-v0015.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: adam louis stephanides <astephan at students.uiuc.edu>
Subject: (urth) Islands in Commonwealth; other Cerberus book
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 13:57:04
Message-ID: <urth-v0015-0119 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0015/0119.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

prion wrote:

> A previous letter to the list (I'm sorry but I don't remember when)
> asked how the Commonwealth could be in a South America geographically
> similar to the current continent when the Commonwealth is described as
> consisting of an archipelago of islands to the south.  The answer is
> that SA does have a long chain of many islands in the south, but it
> closely follows the close, so the questioner probably wouldn't
> remember them or have noticed them just by casually looking in the
> first place.

I was the original questioner, and I was aware of the islands in the
south of SA.  My question was based on my belief that Severian was
asserting that the Commonwealth consisted entirely of islands.  But
reexamining the quote, it now seems clear to me that the relevant
phrase--"a chain of islands like our south"--refers to the southern-
most portion of the Commonwealth, and not to the Commonwealth as a
whole, as I had originally thought.  So there's no problem there.

Robert Borski (incidentally, do you prefer to be addressed like this or as
"scolex"?) wrote:
=20
> Somebody recently mentioned another Cerberus book, but I can't find it in
> the archives. (Seems to me it was French and pulpy???)

That was me too; it's in the archives for June 1, 1998, under the heading
"The Heads of Cerberus," which is also the title of the book.  French no,
pulpy yes.

--Adam

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net