Urth Net

← back to the conversation

the play

Marc Aramini · 30 Jun 2008, 05:41 · from 2008-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) the play
Message-ID: <565224.35168.qm at web58207.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

well, it all depends on how much effort Wolfe put into the play. I don&#39;t find the idea that it could tell us something particular about particular characters absurd at all, but I suppose I will grant that the aggregate of relevance is a valid point.  How minute does Wolfe want to make his extra-textual references? Some works require external context, such as a precursory understanding of the basic features of the saints or religious referents, and other works do not.  This is all tied up with authorial construction and intent.  If a tree falls in a Wolfe book and nobody notices, is the narrator really dead?


      

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net