Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Sev's common lineage

Mark Millman · 30 Jun 2008, 20:54 · from 2008-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: markjmillman at gmail.com (Mark Millman)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:54:25 -0400
Subject: (urth) Sev's common lineage
In-Reply-To: <BLU111-W721613F5D44E056A56F65EE9F0 at phx.gbl>
References: <BLU111-W721613F5D44E056A56F65EE9F0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <c873c2920806301354r72537d34n291cd504e86e022d at mail.gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Wells,

On Monday 30 June 2008, you quoted and wrote:

>>> I still don't see that any
>>> effort should be made to
>>> find a source of exultant
>>> blood for Severian.
>>
>> Severian is the Epitome of Urth, and
>> possibly of humanity, if Urth be tak-
>> en to be the epitome of the human
>> worlds of the galaxy. The exultants
>> are of Urth and have been since the
>> time of the Monarch a thousand
>> years earlier, but originated off-world.
>> It's possible that among the reasons
>> that Ymar and the Old Autarch failed
>> is that they did not represent the ex-
>> ultants. If Severian has exultant heri-
>> tage, then he does.
>
> It seems to me that it could be seen exactly the
> opposite way round.

Indeed it could, depending on what interpretation you prefer.  To go
back to Mr. Tallman's statement, I don't really think that there's any
need to make an effort to find a source of exultant blood for
Severian; I think that Wolfe tells us he has it, and argument to the
contrary is over-interpretation.  But if a reason for effort were
needed, the interpretation I've proposed suggests one.

> The exultants are not really Of This Urth. You
> point out that they originated off-world.

Indeed I do.  Please remember, however, that they're a strain -of
humanity- that diverged off-world, and that they have integrated
themselves into the life of the Commonwealth and, presumably, the
other states of Urth as well.  (For example, there's some evidence to
suggest that exultant bloodlines persist in Ascia.)  Having done so,
they've returned to being part of the humanity of Urth.  At the very
least, we know that they're not a distinct species of humans, since
they can interbreed with the commonality.

> As others have said, the mating of Men and Mon-
> sters (or Angels?), and genetic engineering in
> general, seems to be generally disparaged.  Per-
> haps it was necessary for Severian to be of the
> common(er) people?

Perhaps it is.  I doubt that you will be surprised to learn that I
prefer my own interpretation, to the (slight) extent that I think it's
relevant.

> newt

Best,

Mark Millman

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net