Black hole vs. wormhole

mary whalen · 06 Jul 1998, 17:11 · from urth-v0015.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: mary whalen <marewhalen at yahoo.com>
Subject: (urth)  Re:  Black hole vs. wormhole
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 17:11:33
Message-ID: <urth-v0015-0140 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0015/0140.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is Sean Whalen (prion).

SBear, I don't think that the black hole and white fountain are the
same hole.  If that were so, when they canceled each other out, which
I'm not sure that they would do anyway, the sun would remain small and
red.  The white fountain is continuing to send forth matter and energy
from itself, with is replenishing the sun back to it's old
characteristics.  I think I may have discussed this in my original
post on black holes.

prion
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net