b sharps's Inire theory

Jeff Wilson · 06 Jul 2008, 01:35 · from 2008-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:35:20 -0500
Subject: (urth) b sharps's Inire theory
In-Reply-To: <001401c8def7$df452c40$97d14a0c at rclackey.stic.net>
References: <001401c8def7$df452c40$97d14a0c at rclackey.stic.net>
Message-ID: <48702158.6000503 at io.com>

Roy C. Lackey wrote:
> Just because I have an old-fashioned sense of fairness, I am going to
> surprise everyone and see if I can present b sharp's case, as I see it, so
> that it is more palatable. Maybe I can recast his theory, in outline, so
> that it doesn't seem to trip all over itself.
> 
> The theory that Inire is Rudesind, Fechin and Boatman (maybe some others,
> but not now) is predicated on similarity of physique, simian in nature. The
> other component is that Inire is a Hierogrammate. Like Tzadkiel (hell, he
> may *be* Tzadkiel), he is capable of assuming any form, large or small.

Stop. There is no evidence Tzadkiel can assume _any_ shape. It has 
several at its disposal, but we do not know if they are finely 
customizable. Also, we do not know that Hierogrammates are a race that 
share the same abilities. They might be a society or a class of beings 
in the way the Megatherians are, with varying abilities and hindrances.


>  he can have multiple versions of
> himself that maintain separate existences that need not be aware of each
> other at any given time. Thus the Boatman and Rudesind can both be telling
> the truth to Severian about their life stories, even while living
> simultaneously.

This hypothesis seems safely unfalsifiable. If they have separate lives 
and memories, how is it remotely useful to consider them the same character?

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
< http://www.io.com/~jwilson >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net