What's So Great About Ushas?
Lane Haygood · 13 Jul 2008, 07:38
· from 2008-July.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: lhaygood at gmail.com (Lane Haygood) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:38:10 -0500 Subject: (urth) What's So Great About Ushas? In-Reply-To: <BAY103-W256ADF1E5160631D5D2466D7920 at phx.gbl> References: <BAY103-W256ADF1E5160631D5D2466D7920 at phx.gbl> Message-ID: <8E7E6211-8E56-4EEA-9EEB-50C3DC791659 at gmail.com> Please call me just Lane. If I understand what you're getting at, I think we'd agree that the Hieros have a greater capacity for moral understanding, but not necessarily the actuality of it. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 12, 2008, at 10:52 PM, b sharp <bsharporflat at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Lane Haygood I think I agree with almost your entire post. My only > quibble > would regard where you say: > >> It may not be that the Hierogrammates are "morally superior" to >> humans, in that we all have the same capacity for judging moral and >> immoral actions, but rather that their nature makes them able to >> perceive moral dimensions on acts that we cannot. > > Well, my claim has all along been that Hierogrammates are superior > moral judges > to humans based on their superior perception of moral (and other) > dimensions. > > \ > > Roy, sorry if I wasn't clear in agreeing with you that the > Hierogrammates possess a > lesser moral perception than God. And I think we agree they are > superior to > humans in this regard? > > Roy says: >> Tzadkiel was not only an admitted liar, he was a cheater as well. > > But lying and cheating are considered immoral acts by humans. And > not always. > Many police and military types are specially trained in such tactics > and they are > considered moral actions because they help stop bad guys. Perhaps > Tzadkiel feels > no more guilt in lying to Severian than we would feel for using > artificial mating > calls to lure animals out of a toxic waste spill area. > > and: >> Being elected to a given position is hardly a qualifier for the >> morality of >> the elected. > > Nobody doubts that elections are an imperfect system for choosing > morally superior > individuals, relying as they do on imperfect human judgement. But > the fact that we > continue to engage in elections and other selection processes for > judges and justices > etc. proves that humanity currently thinks it is possible to > ascertain the moral superiority > of one person over another. > > and: >> You have presented a closed system that, by >> definition, not only excludes challenges from outside the system, it >> dismisses those challenges as down-right impertinent. > > Not true. I'm saying that if the Hierogrammates are as Gene Wolfe > seems to present them, > then humans are no more able to judge their morality than animals > are able to judge the > morality of human behavior. Hierogrammates might reasonably be > judged by members of > their own race, or by other beings with equal or greater moral > perception. > > (there is dialog in UotNS suggesting that humans would be like > animals on some > planets and to some other races of beings) > > -bsharp > > _________________________________________________________________ > The i?m Talkaton. Can 30-days of conversation change the world? > http://www.imtalkathon.com/?source=EML_WLH_Talkathon_ChangeWorld > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net