What's So Great About Ushas?

brunians at brunians.org · 16 Jul 2008, 06:46 · from 2008-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) What's So Great About Ushas?
In-Reply-To: <3e1fa2e90807152243j5202f7b8s5d3e8fe12b4e2fb3 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <BAY103-W1816BD1A424980BA227D44D78C0 at phx.gbl>
	<3e1fa2e90807151812n681e157bt6e77a38ecc01c933 at mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0807161150060.2327 at orpheus.qimr.edu.au>
	<3e1fa2e90807152100o551074e5ud02c8c1bd4391612 at mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0807161452220.4307 at orpheus.qimr.edu.au>
	<3e1fa2e90807152243j5202f7b8s5d3e8fe12b4e2fb3 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3512.67.142.130.26.1216190761.squirrel at brunians.org>

Some people maybe take this stuff a little too seriously....



.


> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:14 AM, David Duffy <David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Sure, but the point is that he does make the decision which according to
>> his foreknowledge is the only long term solution. Again the point is
>> that
>> his vision of the outcomes is certain, and so his behaviour "right".
>
>
> By no means!  Only if you're a consequentialist (utilitarian, for example)
> do ends justify means.  And if you are, you've got more problems than it's
> worth.
>
> Is it truly hard to fathom that though evil can be used to bring about
> good,
> it does not itself become good because of it?
>
> Incidentally, many on the other side of this argument have at one point
> insisted that Hierogrammate foresight is perfect.  Please see Roy C.
> Lackey's post a few days ago for proof that it isn't, and then stop saying
> it.  It only clouds the issue.
>
> David Duffy,
>>
>
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net