What's So Great About Ushas?
Dave Tallman · 17 Jul 2008, 18:02
· from 2008-July.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: davetallman at msn.com (Dave Tallman) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:02:55 -0600 Subject: (urth) What's So Great About Ushas? Message-ID: <1bf4dd40807171102l4513191bwa43b35f90eec5905 at mail.gmail.com> Paul B wrote: Even considering the physical implications of your suggestion, you make a preposterous claim here without any evidence. Presumably a white hole is the only way to remove the black one. What would it matter how much time passes? The physical anomalies produced by the New Sun don't care, unless the black hole got a lot bigger after a few hundred years. Given that it's just had the sun to feed on, which it didn't even consume, it's unlikely. Incidentally, it's curious that the introduction of the black hole didn't have similar effects on Urth as that of the white one. As for the suggestion that Hierogrammates went to stellar engineering just to depose Typhon, it sounds like swatting a fly with a Buick. There are two possible mechanisms for the white hole to disrupt earth: thermal and gravitational. I believe the gravitational effects were practically nothing: Baldanders only expected them to ring bells. He predicted the Urth would have problems due to rising sea levels (ice plus energy gives water) and to the heat causing shifts in the earth's crust. The latter is hard to understand, but I suppose some unstable faults could be triggered by changes in heat. If the gravitational effects were really severe for either the white or the black hole, then the Earth's orbit would be perturbed. We have no hint that this was the case, and if it were it would cause even more severe problems for Ushas. Near Typhon's time, the Sun hadn't lost that much heat, so the sea level hadn't dropped much due to increased ice at the poles. People would not have settled in the new low-lying areas. (It's interesteing that the Citadel was usable in Typhon's time. Was the wall perhaps a sea-wall, and the river changed course to flow through later?) The stellar engineering to depose Typhon was huge in its technological power but subtle in its immediate effects. It might be thought of as an economic sanction. Coming in with guns blazing would wipe out more innocents in the short term. Is there a problem with this, even if true? I know some religions that consider everyone to be a sinner. It allows us to consider the Hierogrammates as imperfect but doing the best they could, like the rest of us, instead of absolutely good or absolutely evil, as we have tended to go in this discussion. You seem to conveniently forget that Hierogrammates do possess foresight, in addition to tech that allows creation of black holes. These two alone should suggest they can do pretty much any "mundane" thing (here, building large ship(s) - [if Typhon could do it, they could too] and sending it to point Urth) at pretty much any time, no? I'll allow that they could get together a lot of ships, especially if they only needed to get people off-planet temporarily and then dropped them back when Ushas had settled down. But there's still the issue of panic, and of people's willingness to go on the say-so of cacogens. I don't think it would have been as easy as you think. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20080717/46515036/attachment-0001.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net