latin and perspicuity

Marc Aramini · 22 Jul 2008, 23:37 · from 2008-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) latin and perspicuity
Message-ID: <300120.38573.qm at web58208.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

of course the mistranslated latin is evoking the absence of a perspicuous possibility in language. A one to one ratio of a word and its meaning was abandoned long ago as a possibility with dictionary makers like Boswell, but Vodalus says something about the language they speak having only one meaning in one of his meetings with Sev, as if the future langauge they speak had finally achieved perspicuity.  This creates a huge irony based on all the ambiguous and conceptually difficult events and ideas that severian presents, and creates an odd obviously mistaken linguistic paradigm for the culture of urth as well, completely disproved by the tale of the ascian and its multiple interpretations, though composed entirely of stock phrases.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net