Torturers as priests
Matthew Malthouse · 09 Jul 1998, 19:04
· from urth-v0016.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Matthew Malthouse <matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk> Subject: Re: (urth) Re: Torturers as priests Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 20:04:54 +0100 Message-ID: <urth-v0016-0027 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0016/0027.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mary whalen wrote: >=20 > This is Sean Whalen (prion). >=20 > Matt, I just added this as part of some of my previous posts of the > theory that the torturers are the Urth form of Catholic priests. >=20 > If they can change from being priests to being torturers, it seems > that along the way they could have evolved to include women in some > incarnation(s) of their function, and we don't even know if the women > had differing roles in the past. I meant also that the fact that they > originally had no women (as priests), gained them (as jailers), and > then lost them again (after becoming torturers) is part of the > cyclic/repetitive structure Wolfe likes to use. That's fine. But while one is searching for evidence to support a theory filling the lacunae with "it's a long time, anything could have happend" se= ems a little less than rigourous. > I also think this theory is part of the fact that Wolfe purposely > writes the plot and setting of New Sun to be an amalgam of every SF > cliche and standard there is. A well-known current organization that > changes form in the far future to an ironic form is one of these. >=20 > Lastly, I just read on the Whorl archive list that when Gene Wolfe was > asked the question of "Is there a past, current, or future member of > the Order of Seekers of Truth and Penitence on the Whorl?", he says > "Yes, Silk. > " I take it to mean that Silk is a member of this order because he's > a priest/worshipper of the Outsider (God), and this seems to indicate > that the torturers are, too. But note that the gender roles in the Whorl are diferentiated in a manner reminicent of the church today. That doesn't appear to be the case with the torturers of Ymar's time. Is the equation of Silk with a torturer one of formal function or role perf= ormed? Matthew *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net