New Wolfe Listing on Amazon

brunians at brunians.org · 04 Sep 2008, 00:34 · from 2008-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) New Wolfe Listing on Amazon
In-Reply-To: <BAY106-W45E0C4997B18E118BC8EC855E0 at phx.gbl>
References: <44fb53d10808201938l5b1bd26cq1f1bb3507b4e9f38 at mail.gmail.com>
	<39ed084f0808211108u1ab3299ese281ecf0d3ecac98 at mail.gmail.com>
	<000901c9041b$4db4ea60$dccf4a0c@rclackey>
	<d716a1c40809031121l77ddb153k49109a1d1a2279a7 at mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY106-W18F973C4D786776AEBA18A855E0 at phx.gbl>
	<44fb53d10809031435p6a80d126w315d8ca9cd513aff at mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY106-W45E0C4997B18E118BC8EC855E0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <12042.67.142.130.34.1220488481.squirrel at brunians.org>

You don't think that there was at least occasional transatlantic contact?
Seriously?


.

> Yes, I read that some time ago. I disagree with his take, but he is free
> to use that in his books. I don't really consider that kind of stuff
> errors or historical mistakes. Just an opinion I don't agree with.
>
> Pedro
>
>
>
>
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:35:35 -0400From: matthew.keeley.1 at gmail.comTo:
> urth at lists.urth.netSubject: Re: (urth) New Wolfe Listing on Amazon
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I haven't read the Knight books (I'm not much into Arthurian kind of
> stuff), but I totally recomend the Soldier books. I was hopping that Sidon
> would take Latro to the fabled Egyptian Labirynth; unfortunately it
> didn't. There's a few things in the Soldier books that I think may be a
> bit wrong from a historical point of view though. Not really wrong, but
> questionable at least, but it's minor stuff.
>
> Well, I know Wolfe does have some slightly esoteric theories about ancient
> history - for one thing, he posits at least occasional transatlantic
> travel in the ancient world. I wonder how many "errors" are actually
> examples of Wolfe's advocacy for obscure theories.
>
> Link with Wolfe's thoughts on the ancient world:
> http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze2tmhh/gwjbj3.html#diff
>
>
> -Matt
> _________________________________________________________________
> Explore the seven wonders of the world
> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE_______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net