New Wolfe Listing on Amazon

brunians at brunians.org · 04 Sep 2008, 15:44 · from 2008-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) New Wolfe Listing on Amazon
In-Reply-To: <BAY106-W560E6EE78AF0A4A3AC063485590 at phx.gbl>
References: <44fb53d10808201938l5b1bd26cq1f1bb3507b4e9f38 at mail.gmail.com>
	<39ed084f0808211108u1ab3299ese281ecf0d3ecac98 at mail.gmail.com>
	<000901c9041b$4db4ea60$dccf4a0c@rclackey>
	<d716a1c40809031121l77ddb153k49109a1d1a2279a7 at mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY106-W18F973C4D786776AEBA18A855E0 at phx.gbl>
	<44fb53d10809031435p6a80d126w315d8ca9cd513aff at mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY106-W45E0C4997B18E118BC8EC855E0 at phx.gbl>
	<12042.67.142.130.34.1220488481.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<BAY106-W560E6EE78AF0A4A3AC063485590 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <1490.72.171.0.139.1220543097.squirrel at brunians.org>


> Most of the cases Wolfe refers I'm not really familiar with them. He talks
> about the army of Yucatan arranged just like an Assyrian army. I'm not
> familiar with this so commenting would be folly on my part. But if Wolfe
> implies Assyrian Armies in the americas I doubt it pretty much. One just
> have to look at accounts of the Punic Wars to see that even moving a few
> boats between Sicily and North Africa was a gamble.

For the Romans it was, yes. Was it for the Carthaginians? For the Chinese?
For the Japanese? For the Polynesians?

>                                            Almost 50% of the time
> the fleet would either sank completely or just a few would survive.
> Compare that with vast, constant expeditions before Christ to the americas
> and I find it quite unprobable.

Compare Olmec jade and Shang jade:

http://www.chinese.tcu.edu/www_chinese3_tcu_edu.htm

Compare ancient Japanese and South American pottery:

http://books.google.com/books?id=Yrhp8H0_l6MC&pg=PA187&lpg=PA187&dq=jomon+and+valdivia&source=web&ots=NI1C2N-wiv&sig=8TrGmzEexjF7xjRWgrNF9b-xAYc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result

There's really a lot more.


>                                 But I would have to delve deeply into the
> evidence.

Indeed.

> The nicotine found in mumyes is certainly very compeling evidence of
> contact. I don't know what the official position regarding that is right
> now, if any.

It doesn't matter. The official position is that human beings were hunters
and gatherers until about ten thousand years ago. This is obviously wrong.


>               The roman sculptures in mexico I never heard of. Sounds
> great. Any links?

Can't find one offhand.


.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net