Urth Net

← back to the conversation

OT: Anathem

Matthew Keeley · 15 Sep 2008, 15:41 · from 2008-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: matthew.keeley.1 at gmail.com (Matthew Keeley)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:41:04 -0400
Subject: (urth) OT: Anathem
In-Reply-To: <81c420fa0809150655n78fcb8edy962294747fac784b at mail.gmail.com>
References: <39ed084f0809141908h4ee0b508oc6c0b1d6baf89abe at mail.gmail.com>
	<81c420fa0809150655n78fcb8edy962294747fac784b at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <44fb53d10809150841u565213cei1784a5112a21e7dc at mail.gmail.com>

Anyone read Michael Dirda's review of Anathem in The Washington Post?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090402460.html

Dirda compares Anathem with The Book of the New Sun, which he says is much
superior.

-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20080915/1451feb5/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net