Evil Guest Reviewed in Washington Post SF Roundup
Fernando Q. Gouvea · 13 Oct 2008, 23:02
· from 2008-October.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: fqgouvea at colby.edu (Fernando Q. Gouvea)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:02:16 -0400
Subject: (urth) Evil Guest Reviewed in Washington Post SF Roundup
In-Reply-To: <C51913E2.7C1E%ishmael at drizzle.com>
References: <C51913E2.7C1E%ishmael at drizzle.com>
Message-ID: <48F3D378.8010001 at colby.edu>
I don't find the initial experience of reading Wolfe off-putting, no.
Orson Scott Card once wrote a review (of, I think, Free Live Free, but I
may be misremembering) saying that for him Wolfe had reached or passed
that point. So folks can disagree on that.
I'm a little amazed at the Strange Horizons review. I find An Evil Guest
perfectly accessible on a first reading, and a great deal of fun. It
certainly doesn't clarify the moral status of Reis and Chase, but hey,
when does life ever do that? (My tendency is to think that both of them
are trying to be as moral as they can, though they approach this with
very different premises.) There are certainly mysteries all over the
place, but not all mysteries need to be explained.
Someone mentioned that there is some sort of connection between Finney's
"The Circus of Dr. Lao" and "An Evil Guest" (at the very least because
of the name "Woldercan"). But one of the remarkable features of "Dr Lao"
is exactly Finney's refusal to come up with any explanations at all. The
circus is there and it is what it is, and the novel is concerned with
other things. Similarly, "Guest" doesn't explain a lot of its mysteries;
perhaps it's just that Wolfe is interested in other things.
It seems to me that "An Evil Guest" is something of a romp, and it can
and should be enjoyed as such. Yes, Wolfe's conservative take on a lot
of things is evident in it, and yes, there are a lot of mysteries left
over after my first reading. So what?
Fernando
James Crossley wrote:
> The Strange Horizons review captures a great deal of what I think about
> Wolfe, especially recent works such as "Memorare," _Pirate Freedom_ and now
> _Evil Guest_. All have hidden depths that make them well worth exploring
> and reward rereading, but am I the only one who feels that Wolfe is on the
> verge (if not past it) of making the initial reading experience off-putting?
>
> James
--
==================================================================
Fernando Q. Gouvea
Carter Professor of Mathematics
Colby College Editor, FOCUS
Mayflower Hill 5836 Editor, MAA Reviews
Waterville, ME 04901
fqgouvea at colby.edu
Usually mathematicians have to shoot somebody to get this much publicity.
-- Thomas R. Nicely, on the attention he received after
finding the flaw in Intel's Pentium chip in 1994
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net