Urth Net
Change of Topic: Latro
brunians at brunians.org · 04 Nov 2008, 14:41
· from 2008-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:41:10 -0500 (EST) Subject: (urth) Change of Topic: Latro In-Reply-To: <94068DCC00AD4810A13E1E440136D85C@GATEWAY> References: <d3f.354ce1aa.364105d4 at aol.com> <94068DCC00AD4810A13E1E440136D85C@GATEWAY> Message-ID: <7511.67.142.130.44.1225809670.squirrel at brunians.org> He was home for a while off-stage, between volume two and volume three. He forgets. . > Actually, I don't think Latro will ever get home until he passes through > India, Micronesia, Columbia, Ireland, Britain, Germania, and Slavakia. I > asked Wolfe once if he anticipated a wrap-up to the series and he said no. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: PMorris33 at aol.com > To: urth at lists.urth.net > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 7:56 PM > Subject: (urth) Change of Topic: Latro > > > Does anyone know if a fourth book in the Soldier series is being > contemplated? After all, Latro has not been returned to his home. > > In a message dated 11/3/2008 5:09:14 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > urth-request at lists.urth.net writes: > Send Urth mailing list submissions to > urth at lists.urth.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.urth.net/listinfo.cgi/urth-urth.net > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > urth-request at lists.urth.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > urth-owner at lists.urth.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Urth digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: AEG: Is AEG Lovecraftian? (Bryan Alexander) > 2. Stingray (Nigel Price) > 3. Stingray (Nigel Price) > 4. Re: Stingray (James Wynn) > 5. AEG: Is AEG Lovecraftian? (Nigel Price) > 6. Stingray (Nigel Price) > 7. Re: Stingray (Matthew Keeley) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:10:48 -0500 > From: "Bryan Alexander" <bryan.alexander at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: (urth) AEG: Is AEG Lovecraftian? > To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: > <a55c3dff0811031410h6cd912e8t9690b7f7b5bd81ba at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I admit to bringing a Lovecraftian perspective to my reading of AEG. > That > was due in part to various things I'd heard about the novel, which > were then > brought to mind with the HPL inscription. So I suspected far more > cosmic > horror from various quarters, including the flapping creature, than I > ended > up with. > My Phil Dick-style expectations were confirmed instead. > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Dave Tallman <davetallman at msn.com> > wrote: > > > Kieran Mullen wrote: > > > >> That needs a bit of explanation. For a work to be Lovecraftian I > don't > >> think it is simply sufficient to stick in Hastur and Cthulu and > call it > >> that. Lovecraft (IMO) came up with a truly original ontological > horror > >> premise for his fiction: the universe is dominated by inhuman > forces which > >> we don't have a hope of understanding or defeating. At best we > can only > >> hope that they ignore us. (We can't even pray that they do - > there is no > >> God, only atoms and a void). Humanity is a minor irrelevance in > a dark > >> and hungry universe. Any attempt to try to change that will only > draw the > >> attention of forces that will destroy the inquirer. > >> > >> > > Given that Wolfe is a Christian I doubt very much that he would > write a > > work consistent with such a nihilistic Lovecraftian premise. But > other > > writers, such as August Derleth (also a Christian), have expanded > the > > Lovecraft universe to include a more classical view of good vs. > evil. To me, > > true horror cannot exist in a universe where our ideas of sanity and > > goodness are a mere fluke, a cosmic joke. The efforts of the > protagonists > > become simply silly. > > > > But I don't think the Lovecraft parts are simply tacked on. From the > > beginning Reis announced his intention to retire to the South Seas > (p. 14). > > This cannot be a coincidence. Reis may have learned something during > his > > time as ambassador to Woldercan. He may have realized there was a > connected > > menace on Earth and determined to fight it. To some degree his > provoking a > > fight between Squiddy and the Navy seems to have been a success. At > the very > > least the storms took out many Cthulhu worshipers on the neighboring > > islands. > > > > Even Lovecraft allowed the forces of good to succeed sometimes, for > example > > in "The Dunwich Horror." Even he could not help rooting for humanity > against > > the monsters. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Urth Mailing List > > To post, write urth at urth.net > > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > > > > > > -- > Bryan Alexander > http://infocult.typepad.com/ > http://twitter.com/BryanAlexander > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20081103/cdec52ad/attachment-0001.htm> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 22:33:59 -0000 > From: "Nigel Price" <nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Subject: (urth) Stingray > To: "Urth List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: <AFEFKBJKJDDJOMBNACBNGEEMDNAA.nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > As I was writing about evil undersea cities and civilisations in AEG > and the > Urth Cycle, one part of my mind facetiously wandered and wondered > whether > Gene Wolfe had ever watched the Gerry Anderson puppet show "Stingray" > in the > 1960s. As I thought whimsically about it, the parallels scattered > through > his books became stronger and stranger. Was Seawrack inspired by > Marina? Was > the idea of the US Navy attacking the Storm God inspired by the sight > of > Troy Tempest and the WASPs attacking Titan and his aquaphibian > minions? > > No, of course not, it's a silly idea. It's not as if Wolfe ever refers > to > puppetry in his stories. > > Hang on there, wait a minute... > > What about that dream Severian has of the toy theatre and the > marionette > versions of himself and Baldander? > > Goodness! If I'm right, anything can happen in the next half hour... > > Nigel (in a playful mood) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 23:00:41 -0000 > From: "Nigel Price" <nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Subject: (urth) Stingray > To: "Urth List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: <AFEFKBJKJDDJOMBNACBNOEEMDNAA.nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Weird but true: Gerry Anderson and Ray Harryhausen were both speakers > at the > 1987 WorldCon in Brighton, England, which Gene and Rosemary Wolfe also > attended. > > Did Wolfe hear Gerry Anderson talk about his work? > > Then again, for anyone interested in creating submarine squid deities, > Harryhausen's amusing account of animating the six-limbed giant > octopus in > "It came from beneath the sea" might well have been inspirational. > (The > octopus only had six limbs because Harryhausen was on a tight budget > and an > even tighter timetable. Animating extra limbs takes time, and time is > money!) > > Nigel (who is trying to write a serious analysis of AEG - coming soon > - but > keeps getting distracted by whimsical notions) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:57:00 -0600 > From: "James Wynn" <crushtv at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: (urth) Stingray > To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: <8349DBE9E74F4391A5D742992EE9395D at GATEWAY> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > > No, of course not, it's a silly idea. It's not as if Wolfe ever > refers to > > puppetry in his stories. > > In The Book of the Short Sun, Horn remembers the following from his > childhood: > > "I once had a toy, a little wooden man in a blue coat who was moved by > strings. When I played with him, I made him walk and bow, and spoke > for him. > I practiced until I thought myself very clever. One day I saw my > mother > holding the two sticks that held his strings, and my little wooden man > saluting my youngest sister much more cleverly than I could have made > him do > it, and laughing with his head thrown back, then mourning with his > face in > his hands. I never spoke of it to my mother, but I was angry and > ashamed." > On Blue's Waters, pg. 158 > > Soon he after he was assaulted by the triple-jawed leatherskin---an > obvious > reference to Pinnochio's Dog-fish. > > J. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:04:01 -0000 > From: "Nigel Price" <nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Subject: (urth) AEG: Is AEG Lovecraftian? > To: "Urth List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: <AFEFKBJKJDDJOMBNACBNCEENDNAA.nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Kieran Mullen asks... > > >>So what do you think? Is AEG just a romp > >>through different genres or is it really meant > >>to be a horror novel? > > No, I don't think that AEG is a Lovecraftian horror story in the sense > that > you define. As far as I understand - which is not very far at all - it > borrows some Lovecraftian elements, but does not share their > underlying > philosophy, their "ontological horror premise" (great phrase!). > > I've read back through all the posts here on AEG and I've reread bits > of the > story but I still don't really understand how all the parts of the > book fit > together. I'm trying to work it out. The nature of Gideon Chase seems > to be > key. That in turn, because Gideon was born there and is probably a > human-Woldercanese hybrid, is tied up with the moral status of the > planet > Woldercan. > > Wolfe depicts Woldercan as a place which has talking fish, dangerous > forests, alchemy and different physics. The inhabitants superficially > resemble humans but are subtly different. They can breed successfully > with > lower animals, including humans, and male Woldercaners try to seduce > and > mate with human females. All in all, Woldercan sounds more like > Fairyland > than a conventional science fiction alien planet. If it is a sort of > SF > Fairyland, that would make the Wolders fairies, or fairy analogues > anyway. > > The moral status of fairies and Fairyland is moot in the European > tradition. > Sometimes they are morally equivalent to humans, with the "good" and > "bad" > fairies familiar in children's stories. Often, though, they are > depicted as > being amoral and "other", outside human schemes of morality and, when > their > stories get merged with the Christian tradition, outside the divine > scheme > of salvation. > > Yet another tradition, evident in stories like that of Tam Lin and > some > versions of Thomas the Rhymer, has Fairyland as a subsidiary dominion > of > Hell to which it pays tax (usually every seven years) in the form of > human > souls. Fairies in this tradition become similar to devils or demons. > > In the opening chapter of AEG, Gideon tells the President that there > is no > such thing as good and evil. His position seems to be that there is no > such > thing as absolute good or evil, only things that we ourselves > disapprove of. > If he means that no person is ever wholly good or wholly evil, he must > surely be right. If he means that good and evil do not themselves > exist, > then, from Wolfe's perspective as a Christian, he must surely be > wrong. He > seems to mean both, which is confusing! > > Gideon's perspective is either that of an amoral alien, analogous to > the > amoral fairies I described above, with no human sense of good or evil, > or he > himself is evil and is deceiving others with his untruths, which makes > him > more of the "demonic" type of alien/fairy. > > Wolfe has stated in interviews that his starting point for AEG was the > idea > of a detective who was a wizard. Gideon is a wizard, and certainly the > archetypal wizard, Merlin, is half-human and half-devil in some > accounts of > his parentage. > > By this account, Gideon is at best amoral and at worst positively > evil. > > At the start of AEG, the President of the United States attempts to > recruit > Gideon to work with the FBI in catching Bill Reis. In many stories, > certainly in the 1930s pulp stories which Wolfe is pastiching, this > would > make Gideon the good guy, an untouchable science fictional Eliot Ness. > But > there's a strong element of satire in AEG. The USA over which the > President > presides is a place where abortion has become legalised child murder, > and > where the various federal agencies fight an endless turf war against > each > other, possibly under the manipulative influence of demonic submarine > aliens. The moral status of the President in this story is pretty > cloudy, > especially as we later come to see that Bill Reis himself may be far > from > being the evildoer the President claims. As the President's agent, > Gideon's > moral status is equally suspect. > > That's at the start of the story. Does Gideon change? > > I'm not clear in my own mind whether Bill Reis starts off bad but is > changed > by the transforming power of his love for Cassie, or whether he was > always > good and it just takes Cassie and the reader a long time to find the > correct > moral orientation within the confusing landscapes of AEG. I think that > there's at least an element of the former because Bill Reis learned > his > alchemy and other tricks on the morally dubious Woldercan. > > Either way, Gideon's transforms Cassie into a star (her name, after > all, is > that of an astronomical star) and its her loveliness which captures > both > Gideon and Bill Reis' hearts. Somehow, this love helps to orientate > all > three of them. Cassie chooses to marry Bill and Gideon goes to work > for him, > although he doesn't seem to break his agreement with the President so > much > as suspend it. > > That seems to be one half of the story. Bill is inspired to > self-sacrifice, > Cassie loves the Christ-like Bill and Gideon is working, at least for > the > moment, for the good guys. Gideon may have transformed Cassie into a > star in > order to trap Reis, but the her power of beauty has transformed all > three of > them for the better. > > But the other half of the story seems to involve putting the bad guys > into a > properly inverted hierarchy of wickedness. > > Cassie's story of how she came to love the neighbour's dog is > instructive in > this context. Scared of the neighbour's dog but even more scared of > her > violently abusive father, she finds herself sheltering with the animal > and > accepting its protection. Her clear perception of the greater source > of > danger enables her to accept the dog just as she later accepts the > help of > the bat creatures which would otherwise have terrified her in order to > escape the agents of the evil Storm God. > > The US Navy act as agents of the bad American President and pursue > Bill Reis > for his gold. Reis uses that gold, however, to direct them against the > Squid > God. If the US President, his navy and other agencies are not made > virtuous > as such, they are at least properly directed against the greater evil > of the > malevolent underwater alien. > > I still don't fully understand the ending. Why does Gideon return to > Woldercan? Because it is his true home? Perhaps it's because the spell > of > Cassie's star quality has been broken and without it he has fallen > from > virtue back to his old immoral/amoral ways. I don't know what Cassie > is > looking for. > > As an allegory, AEG is confusing. But I don't think it is an allegory > any > more than it's Lovecraftian horror. It uses allegory, or has an > allegorical > dimension, but there's a lot more going on and the correspondences > between > characters and qualities seem to be dynamic rather than static. > > Nigel > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:10:14 -0000 > From: "Nigel Price" <nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Subject: (urth) Stingray > To: "Urth List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: <AFEFKBJKJDDJOMBNACBNGEENDNAA.nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Thanks for that, James. I'd forgotten about that marionette reference > in > OBW. > > There's the story "The Toy Theater" in TIoDDaOSaOS too. That's all > about > marionettes. > > I started this thread as a sort of joke on myself, but now I'm really > beginning to wonder! > > Nigel > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 20:08:43 -0500 > From: "Matthew Keeley" <matthew.keeley.1 at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: (urth) Stingray > To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: > <44fb53d10811031708s57a39c09k508af7025e14b5bd at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Nigel Price <nigelaprice at talktalk.net> > wrote: > > Thanks for that, James. I'd forgotten about that marionette > reference in > > OBW. > > > > There's the story "The Toy Theater" in TIoDDaOSaOS too. That's all > about > > marionettes. > > > > I started this thread as a sort of joke on myself, but now I'm > really > > beginning to wonder! > > > > Nigel > > > > And "Strange Birds" from the chapbook of the same name. Have we ever > discussed those two stories here? I thought they were pretty good, but > I'm not sure how many people actually ordered the chapbook. Well at > least Mr. Gevers read it: > http://slaughterhousestudios.blogspot.com/2006/05/strange-birds-indeed.html > > Minor spoiler > - > - > - > - > - > - > - > - > - > "Strange Birds" actually features the return of Stromboli [sic?] from > "The Toy Theater". I guess Wolfe does have a thing for puppets and > puppeteers. > > -Matt > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > > End of Urth Digest, Vol 51, Issue 4 > *********************************** > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel > Deals! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: > http://www.urth.net_______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net