Urth Net
re silk is hot
Chris · 07 Nov 2008, 12:27
· from 2008-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: rasputin_ at hotmail.com (Chris) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:27:49 +0000 Subject: (urth) re silk is hot In-Reply-To: <43554.41371.qm at web58204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <43554.41371.qm at web58204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <BAY119-W54A5646993A979D1502E7F86190 at phx.gbl> Whether we come to agreement or not, failing to accept compatible assumptions is not the end of things. One person may hold assumptions that are logically incompatible, or perhaps simply false. But you haven't really elaborated on these differing assumptions, whatever they might be. You seem to expect people to not take part in their own governance, which is not possible as long as they're actually alive. I would call this logically incoherent, assuming you don't claim that it's our moral duty to kill ourselves. -- "When small men begin to cast big shadows, it means that the sun is about to set." -- Lin Yutang > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:53:06 -0800 > From: marcaramini at yahoo.com > To: urth at urth.net > Subject: (urth) re silk is hot > > Chris raises some interesting points but if we don't accept the same assumptions there is no way to come to an agreement. In the absence of the relativistic statements you mention we must accept absolutes. And what if those absolutes are weird? Yes, people are sometimes ill suited to get through life and would fail in any attempt to impose governance on their behavior or an acceptable one for their society. Even though someone has stake in an issue they cannot change the cultural definitions that limit the concept, and in that way freedom is indeed t best a soft-determined illusion. People can't agree on the definition of life so it is difficult to accept that relativistic options are not valid. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_faster_112008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20081107/d0620061/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net