Severian I, Severian II, Severian III, Severian Ad Nauseum
Lane Haygood · 03 Dec 2008, 22:29
· from 2008-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: lhaygood at gmail.com (Lane Haygood) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 16:29:49 -0600 Subject: (urth) Severian I, Severian II, Severian III, Severian Ad Nauseum In-Reply-To: <4764.67.142.130.11.1228343330.squirrel at brunians.org> References: <W308581046832851228331045@webmail3> <93d4039f0812031112u55f46223iee671bd8f8475923 at mail.gmail.com> <272706220812031149q5be14195x59b8143bba2bbfc at mail.gmail.com> <93d4039f0812031154h393776ccs4d64dcde38bb373c at mail.gmail.com> <4764.67.142.130.11.1228343330.squirrel at brunians.org> Message-ID: <272706220812031429w6866e8e2j70002a4ec42634a1 at mail.gmail.com> Quit stealing my jokes. Lane On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:28 PM, <brunians at brunians.org> wrote: > > Yes, my basic rundown was meant as that. > > > Heck, I even conflated Aristotle with Aquinas very badly at the end. > > So did Aquinas, though not necessrily more at the end than the beginning > or middle.... > > > > . > > > On 12/3/08, Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'll explicate and clarify this later. What we're really talking about > >> with > >> Aristotle requires us to contrast universality of a given idea with > >> Plato's > >> ideas about universality. I'm just at work and can't write it out at > >> the > >> moment. > >> > >> Lane > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:12 PM, John Watkins <john.watkins04 at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Yes, "form" and "anima" mean the same thing here (although not always, > >> > because "anima" will sometimes mean "breath" or "soul" when "form" > >> > will not.) > >> > > >> > Basic Aristotelian metaphysics: entity = form + matter. > >> > > >> > This is easiest to understand via artifacts. A blacksmith imagines > >> > the form of a sword, then takes matter, steel, and forges it into the > >> > sword. The "form," existing in the mind of the blacksmith, becomes > >> > instantiated in the matter of the steel. But the substance, the thing > >> > itself, is neither the steel nor the picture in the head of the > >> > blacksmith, but their union in the sword. > >> > > >> > For a living thing, the form is the anima, the life-principle--for > >> > humans, you might call it the mind or the soul. The matter is the > >> > body. Severian and Apu-Punchau are the same "form" instantiated, or > >> > "written," in different matters. Nevertheless they are distinct > >> > entities. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 12/3/08, Son of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >-----Original Message----- > >> > > >From: John Watkins [mailto:john.watkins04 at gmail.com] > >> > > >Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 10:42 AM > >> > > >To: 'The Urth Mailing List' > >> > > >Subject: Re: (urth) Severian I, Severian II, Severian III, > >> Severian > >> Ad Nauseum > >> > > > > >> > > >On 12/3/08, Son of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org> wrote: > >> > > >> from the perspective of the 4 books proper, there is only really > >> one > >> Severian body, though that is confused by the tomb. This is why there > >> is > >> the explosion when he meets Apu Punchau. The Two bodies can't be in the > >> same time because they are one, ala Inire's law of mirrors (so to > >> speak). > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Book V, as a Sequel, convolutes the hell out of that simplicity. > >> By > >> most readings, we now have to modify Apu Punchau to be this Aquastor > >> Tzadkiel made. Now, if Tzadkiel made him a new body and discarded the > >> old > >> (which I've argued is not necessarily in the text) he does not really > >> run > >> the risk of self cancellation when he meets Apu Punchau in the stone > >> town. > >> Right? If it's a new body, it's NOT subject to that time paradox, I > >> don't > >> think. They're not two instances of the same body, unless I'm right > >> that > >> Tzadkiel just fixed his body and resurrected him into the same one. > >> > > >> (that argument here: > >> http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2008-December/010873.html > ) > >> > > >> So, the self cancellation scene becomes dodgy in light of the > >> sequel, > >> unless we realize that what Tzadkiel did is NOT necessarily a new body > >> separate from the Author of BoTNS. > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >I don't think the bodies are the problem with Apu Punchau. It's > >> the > >> forms. > >> > > > > >> > > >The Hieros explain that at the end of Urth, I think, with the bit > >> > > >about writing the same lines too close together. > >> > > > > >> > > >There's a lot of this Aristotelian/Scholastic philosophy dusted > >> about > >> > > >in the Sun books--think also of Severian's definition of > >> > > >larvae--"masked spirits." Hardly what a modern who's taken a > >> semester > >> > > >of biology thinks, but absolutely accurate in Aristotelian > >> > > >metaphysics. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > The form is what the Heirodules call the Anima, no? > >> > > the example is of a verse. The Verse would be the Anima, the > >> multiple > >> writings in the dust would be the instances that cancel each other out. > >> The > >> way they explain it is different than the Law of Mirrors cancellation, I > >> think. > >> > > > >> > > Here's the relevant passage, which does account for why his Aquastor > >> would leave a corpse where Malrubius's wouldn't. > >> > > > >> > > man this shit is really confusing. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > "One further question, illustrious Hierodules, before you return me > >> to > >> my own period. When I spoke with Master Malrubius beside the sea, he > >> dissolved into a glittering dust. And yet " I could not say it, but my > >> eyes > >> sought out the corpse. > >> > > Barbatus nodded. "That eidolon, as you call them, had been in > >> existence > >> only briefly. I don't know what energies Tzadkiel called upon to support > >> you > >> on the ship; it may even be that you yourself drew the support you > >> needed > >> from whatever source was at hand, just as you took power from the ship > >> when > >> you tried to raise your steward. But even if it was a source you left > >> behind > >> when you came here, you had lived a long time before that, on the ship, > >> in > >> Yesod, on the ship again, in the tender, in Typhon's time, and so on. > >> During > >> all that time you breathed, ate, and drank matter that was not unstable, > >> converting it to your body's use. Thus it became a substantial body." > >> > > "But I'm dead not even here, dead back there on Tzadkiel's ship." > >> > > "Your twin lies dead there," Barbatus told me. "As another lies dead > >> here. I might say in passing that if he weren't dead, we couldn't have > >> done > >> what we did, because every living being is more than mere matter." He > >> paused > >> and glanced toward Fainulimus for help, but received none. "What do you > >> know > >> of the anima?" > >> > > I thought then of Ava, and what she had said to me: "You're a > >> materialist, like all ignorant people. But your materialism doesn't make > >> materialism true." Little Ava had died with Foila and the rest. > >> "Nothing," I > >> muttered. "I know nothing of the anima." > >> > > "In a way, it's like a line of verse. Famulimus, what was the one > >> you > >> quoted to me?" > >> > > His wife sang, "Awake! for Morning in the Bowl of Night, Has flung > >> the > >> Stone that puts the Stars to Flight." > >> > > "Yes," I said. "I understand." > >> > > Barbatus pointed. "Suppose I were to write those lines upon that > >> wall > >> and then to write them again upon that other wall. Which would be the > >> true > >> lines?" > >> > > "Both," I said. "And neither. The true lines are not writing, nor > >> speech > >> either. I can't say what they are." > >> > > "That is the way of the anima, as I understand it. It was written > >> there." He indicated the dead man. "Now it is written in you. When the > >> light > >> of the White Fountain touches Urth, it will be written there again. Yet > >> the > >> anima will not be erased in you by that writing. Unless " > >> > > I waited for him to continue. > >> > > Ossipago said, "Unless you come too close. If you write a name in > >> the > >> dust and retrace it with your finger, there are not two names, but one. > >> If > >> two currents flow through a conductor, there is one current." > >> > > While I stared in disbelief, Famulimus sang, "You came too near your > >> double once, you know; that was here, in this poor town of stones. Then > >> he > >> was gone, and only you remained. Our eidolons are always of the dead. > >> Have > >> you not wondered why? Be warned!" > >> > > Barbatus nodded. "But as for our returning you to your own time, we > >> can't help you. Your green man knew more than we, perhaps; or at least > >> he > >> had more energy at his disposal. We'll leave you food, water, and a > >> light; > >> but you'll have to wait for the White Fountain. It shouldn't be long, as > >> Famulimus said." > >> > > She had begun to fade into the past already, so that her song seemed > >> to > >> come from far away. "Do not destroy the corpse, Severian. However > >> tempted > >> you may be be warned!" > >> > > Barbatus and Ossipago had faded while I watched Famulimus. When her > >> voice was gone, there was no sound in the House of Apu-Punchau but his > >> own > >> faint breath. " > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Urth Mailing List > >> > > To post, write urth at urth.net > >> > > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Urth Mailing List > >> > To post, write urth at urth.net > >> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > >> > > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Urth Mailing List > >> To post, write urth at urth.net > >> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Urth Mailing List > > To post, write urth at urth.net > > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20081203/42b060cb/attachment-0001.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net