Urth Net

← back to the conversation

House Absolute

Jeff Wilson · 04 Dec 2008, 02:21 · from 2008-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:21:06 -0600
Subject: (urth) House Absolute
In-Reply-To: <3130.198.1228350535.squirrel at o2.hostbaby.com>
References: <W4942512586147901228349723@webmail6>
	<3130.198.1228350535.squirrel at o2.hostbaby.com>
Message-ID: <49373E92.9090009 at io.com>

Tim Walters wrote:
>> I'm no archaeologist, but isn't the earth a city like UR is found in
>> considered rock and not just dirt.
> 
> Nope. Otherwise the artifacts would be fossilized.
> 
>> and if not, isn't it rocky enough for someone like Severian who knows of
>> Lightning rather than Electricity, to take a hardpacked sediment as rock?
>> I mean, you can stand on it. you can carve steps into it.
> 
> You can't build a cliff that tall out of it without it collapsing.
> 
> But for me this is somewhat beside the point. If the scene doesn't
> indicate deep futurity, then there's simply no reason for it to exist. I'm
> happy to accept felicitous implausibilities--in fact what I'm advocating
> is still rather implausible--but not ones that reduce rather than enhance
> the meaning of the text.

What a kind offer! What objective metric is being used by what fully 
informed party to judge the meaning of the text?

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
< http://www.io.com/~jwilson >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net