Urth Net

← back to the conversation

An Old mystery ...

John Watkins · 05 Dec 2008, 22:15 · from 2008-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 17:15:23 -0500
Subject: (urth) An Old mystery ...
In-Reply-To: <4939A64B.3040705 at io.com>
References: <mailman.31357.1228424289.21489.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
	<49393B5B.8000608 at verizon.net> <4939628D.7020405 at io.com>
	<93d4039f0812050927n4607be4er5e3e15f972c6f333 at mail.gmail.com>
	<4939A64B.3040705 at io.com>
Message-ID: <93d4039f0812051415s708ff779m7ce6b6b6a08db1a2 at mail.gmail.com>

On 12/5/08, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> wrote:
> John Watkins wrote:
> > Roy explained it back in June.
> >
> >
> http://lists.urth.net/htdig.cgi/urth-urth.net/2008-June/009108.html
> >
>
> His argument is well reasoned, but it rests on some fine hair splitting that
> falls below the demonstrated level of lexical resolution of dialogue in the
> Book that is translated across universes and back in time. "we condemned"
> simply can't be taken at literal face value in a book deliberately written
> to be ambiguous at every level.
>

"We have condemned" strikes me as remarkably straight-forward.  A
character claims responsibility for something that, logically, she
would be better off denying.  What's your proposed reading of that
bit?

I guess it could mean "We (by not taking direct action after Typhon
screwed everything up) have (in effect) condemned..." but that seems
to me to be a more tortured reason.

Additionally, without Apheta's claim of responsibility for the black
hole, what are we to make of it?


> --
> Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
> < http://www.io.com/~jwilson >
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net