Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Chesterton

Alex David Groce · 05 Aug 1998, 10:40 · from urth-v0017.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alex David Groce" <adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: (urth) Chesterton
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:40:09
Message-ID: <urth-v0017-0088 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0017/0088.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 5,  8:16am, Michael Straight wrote:
> Subject: Re: (urth) Chesterton
> On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, adam louis stephanides wrote:
>
> > On a completely different topic, I know that Wolfe admires Chesterton, =
but
> > Chesterton has never seemed "Wolfeian" to me, to employ a Borgesian
> > temporal inversion.  But in THE COLLECTED WORKS OF G. K. CHESTERTON vol.
> > 14, which contains hundreds of pages of unpublished short stories,
> > novelettes, and fragments, there is a short story, "Child Street," which
> > did strike me as very Wolfeian. It's an excellent story, and worth seek=
ing
> > out in a library or through interlibrary loan.  (The samw volume contai=
ns
> > another excellent unpublished short story, "Le Jongleur de Dieu," which=
 is
> > not particularly Wolfeian, but is strikingly un-Chestertonian.)
>
> I've always thought "The Man Who Was Thursday" was a bit Wolfean (albeit
> less subtle than Wolfe) in it's attempts at deliberately misdirecting the
> reader, and perhaps also in the really weird twist everything takes at the
> end.
>
> -Rostrum
>
	I think Chesterton's influence is more philosophical than literary.
 Wolfe has stated many times his vast admiration for Chesterton and Kipling=
 (as
well as Mark's Engineering Handbook), and I think that a lot of what he doe=
s at
shorter lengths could be described as writing Kipling stories with a
Chestertonian worldview.  Wolfe's portrayed universe is admittedly far dark=
er
in tone than Chesterton's.  But then, I think Borges once said that Chester=
ton
is really closer to Kafka than anyone thinks, he just hides it well.
	As to obvious influences, I think Wolfe's essays and interviews have a
very Chestertonian feel--Wolfe's always saying G. K.-ish things that at fir=
st
seem silly, then on reflection appear to possibly be profound truths.  And =
his
fondness for ideas like the return of cavalry or MX missles on wooden boats=
 is
very Chestertonian in the "cheat-the-prophet" sense.  In fact, such ideas s=
eem
to me a combination of Kipling's fondness for railroads & other engineering
feats and Chesterton's love of the wildly implausible...
	And if Silk in NIGHTSIDE isn't Father Brown redux, I'll eat my hat.


--=20
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." - John 8:32
--
Alex David Groce (adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu)
Senior (Computer Science/Multidisciplinary Studies in Technology & Fiction)
'98-99 NCSU AITP Student Chapter President
608 Charleston Road, Apt. 1E (919)-233-7366
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~adgroce

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net