Science catches up to the New Sun

brunians at brunians.org · 13 Dec 2008, 00:40 · from 2008-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:40:13 -0500 (EST)
Subject: (urth) Science catches up to the New Sun
In-Reply-To: <W2676413148322701229127330@webmail1>
References: <W2676413148322701229127330@webmail1>
Message-ID: <50423.66.126.239.225.1229128813.squirrel at brunians.org>

It could be contracting now if time ran backwards....


.


> Of course, I'm far too much of a knucklehead to speak well about this
> theories potential veracity, but I've intuited this since I was a stoned
> 19 year old looking at Stephen Hawkings model where he has a big sphere
> with a big bang on one end and a big crunch on the other.  I thought, "NO
> NO NO, you' have to take either pole, bring them together in the middle
> until they are the same point. Then you've got the Donut or Bagel theory
> of the Universe, where the Big Bang is the Big Crunch, and the curves of
> the hole are event horizons.
>
> Then I saw this AMAZING lecture by Stan Tenen, called Geometric Metaphors
> for Life where he extracted the same basic theory out of a very strange
> reading of the Torah.  Anyone know Stan Tenen? Meru Foundation.  Very
> interesting stuff there.  Hard for me to follow. there are some overview
> videos on youtube.
>
>
> he's doing work with numbers and geometry, but it's not Kaballah, or
> Gematria.
> he comes up with geometric models exrapolated from the letters, which
> describe a Torus, the shadows of which can depict every hebrew letter, and
> further extrapolates these Apple and Seed models that speak to this notion
> of Re-Genesis.  Great stuff.  Give it a look. trust me, incredibly
> interesting stuff, potentially VERY important. Sort of a voice in the
> wilderness.
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-208619888961779202&hl=en
>
>
>>I'm pretty sure this isn't the first time this theory has been bandied
>>about, but this sounds pretty much like the cosmology of the New Sun,
>> except
>>it's been posited as reality:
>>
>>
>>
>>Most cosmologists believe that our universe emerged from a singularity
>>during the Big Bang. But now physicists are exploring the possibility
>> that
>>our universe was created by the death of an earlier universe.
>>
>>Martin Bojowald and Abhat Ashtekar began researching their theory of loop
>>quantum cosmology (LQC), an approach to cosmology that combine's
>> Einstein's
>>theory of gravity with quantum mechanics. They have modeled the birth of
>> our
>>universe, exploring the mathematics of universe as it contracts back
>> toward
>>its point of origin.
>>
>>Bojowald's major realisation was that unlike general relativity, the
>> physics
>>of LQC did not break down at the big bang. Cosmologists dread the
>>singularity because at this point gravity becomes infinite, along with
>> the
>>temperature and density of the universe. As its equations cannot cope
>> with
>>such infinities, general relativity fails to describe what happens at the
>>big bang. Bojowald's work showed how to avoid the hated singularity,
>> albeit
>>mathematically. "I was very impressed by it," says Ashtekar, "and still
>> am."
>>
>>The researchers have found that when applying LQC, the universe does not
>>revert back to a singularity as it contracts. Instead of seeing a big
>> bang,
>>the models indicate that the universe experienced a big bounce, with a
>>predecessor universe contracting as it ended and then reemerging as our
>> new,
>>expanding universe. If the theory proves correct, it could mean that our
>>universe does not have a finite beginning and end but is, instead, part
>> of a
>>chain of universes that expand and then contract to give way to a brand
>> new
>>universe.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net