AEG clones
Dave Tallman · 21 Dec 2008, 12:27
· from 2008-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: davetallman at msn.com (Dave Tallman) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:27:46 -0700 Subject: (urth) AEG clones In-Reply-To: <797FEFBC5B9A41EF806452907A621060@GATEWAY> References: <797FEFBC5B9A41EF806452907A621060@GATEWAY> Message-ID: <494E3642.9060104 at gmail.com> James Wynn wrote: > It's true that Cassie wears green prior to the party, but this solution is > no more "text-based" than your prior theory. It is significantly less so, > really, since it relies on reams of supposition about what might have or > have not happened between the time Cassie reached the mountain and when she > got home. Rather than solving anything, it inelegantly raises an > intimidating army of intractable mysteries. > That may be true of Roy's original theory, but not of my revised version (that Reis saw her before the glamour, using Aaberg as his spy). Chase simply took her home -- no extra suppositions are needed. > On the other hand, your prior theory succeeds in resolving the issue of why > Reis was lying up a storm about seeing her at the play. Why *after the fact* > would Reis need to lie about seeing her at the play? Because no one else saw > him there? So what? So they didn't see him. He just says, "You must have > missed seeing me." Statements by Reis: 1) "...I saw 'The Red Spot' tonight..." (p. 67). 2) "You were wearing green the first time I saw you." (p. 119) 3) "I was thinking of the party." (p. 119) 4) "I didn't [see the play]. I know I said I did, but that was..." (p. 119) The hard one to explain is #4. He chose to contradict himself, when he could have kept consistent by sticking to the idea that he was just thinking about the party, that her brown dress in the play didn't count because she in a role, etc. Clone theory: 1) F, 2) T, 3) T, 4) T. More trues than falses this way, but why not keep it simple and take the actions of his clone for his own? Loden dress theory: 1) T, 2) T, 3) F, 4) F. In this one, he had been caught in an admission he didn't want to make (#2). He covered for it clumsily, perhaps because he was flustered. The Rusterman conversation is full of lies and half-truths on both sides. Part of the fun is figuring them out. His explanation of the reason he took the bracelet back from Margaret is at least full of lies by omission. "I had hoped that you would love it..." (and get radiation poisoning).
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net