The argument for Intractability

Andrew Dubbeld · 25 Dec 2008, 14:03 · from 2008-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: andy at foisdin.com (Andrew Dubbeld)
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:03:16 +1100
Subject: (urth) The argument for Intractability
In-Reply-To: <49530FA1.7070405 at io.com>
References: <COL109-W1507C1387DD9BFE863BAF4D7ED0 at phx.gbl>
	<49530FA1.7070405 at io.com>
Message-ID: <495392A4.30303 at foisdin.com>

Jeff Wilson wrote:
> Right, however Jesus did have/has enduring union with the divine, 
> post-Ascension. Severian seems to *lose* union with the divine, taking 
> up once again mortal habits like sleeping in his bower on Ushas.
> 

At very least, he seems to have retained his ability to travel to different periods, etc.

I'm halfway through a re-read of Urth: from memory, I got the impression that he lost his communion with the divine by the end, but he writes as if he still has the ability to go anywhere / do anything.

i.e. revisiting the inn with the resurrected dead man, and fancying that he is three or four of the people who aided him in the night.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net