Silk corrupted?

Jordon Flato · 22 Jan 2009, 23:47 · from 2009-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jordonflato at gmail.com (Jordon Flato)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:47:27 -0800
Subject: (urth) Silk corrupted?
In-Reply-To: <W6764015066278171232667741@webmail18>
References: <W6764015066278171232667741@webmail18>
Message-ID: <273409710901221547r55990f36g2e77f0e51dd48748 at mail.gmail.com>

That's why I don't want him in the conversation:  No you guys, it's
obviously THIS.  *I smack forehead wondering how I could have missed it*

and that is also why I'd be intensely interested in his thoughts.  On the
other hand, these theological arguments hit close to home in that regard so
he may not find much to like in it at all, on a certain level...

who knows.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20090122/9c27fb59/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net