Ansible Interview

James Wynn · 25 Jan 2009, 20:00 · from 2009-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:00:09 -0600
Subject: (urth) Ansible Interview
References: <mailman.9833.1232582047.2909.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><497867E5.2010005 at verizon.net><ecbb2eb0901240433p1341d1a3ied29caa9e693e766 at mail.gmail.com><7E62E592A5CA4E268CC4C9708AF1851E@GATEWAY><39ed084f0901241440v70ce97b4s73983a1fd80e6c54 at mail.gmail.com><F5E86098D2C64DD0A8A35FAB60FBDB3D@GATEWAY><497BC6CE.9030909 at io.com><A1ADA7E5C02547DFA91AE911EB8B59D0@GATEWAY><497BFE71.5040702 at io.com><85450FE639744252A140DAAB933C826E@GATEWAY><497CA13E.80400 at io.com>
	<0F7C52860DC74EDD9D1210178F8F52E6@GATEWAY><39557.198.1232907552.squirrel at o2.hostbaby.com><497CB081.7030904 at io.com>
	<47570.198.1232911727.squirrel at o2.hostbaby.com>
Message-ID: <BE049394306E4A958B18F6E844EB0A7D@GATEWAY>

Remember that I am only trying to explain that Wolfe has not defied physics 
in having Silk see shadows in some valleys. I think I've got everyone to 
admit that it is possible so long one abandon's preconceptions about the way 
the Whorl looks.

Jeff:
>That would require tipping the base at a greater than complimentary
>angle with the slope of the mountain, that is, a degree for every degree
>short of a sheer, vertical cliff, and then more according to how much
>shadow you want. Unless you begin with a cartoonishly steep mountain,
>your valley floor ends up tilted as much as a conventional mountain
>slope on earth, making it very unvalley-like. And you still have to
>answer, what's holding this mountain up?

I imagine mountains that look like the peaks of the Alps. Perhaps the Alps 
are cartoonishly steep, but the mountains approaching the ships deck are 
intended to make passage difficult. On the other hand, you could have a 
mountain that is positively sheer only on one side that over-looks a valley. 
That would accomplish the same thing. Or a deep valley with steep sides as 
well.

Jeff:
>Are you privy to the particular "hollowing-out" process used? There are
>several, even now.

Are you? I would guess it did not involve a circular cutting drill like they 
use to make subways. I presume they used lots of explosives and then 
smoothed things out as necessay with bull-dozing equipment. Various tracts 
would be assigned a project number and date for completion.

Tim:
> If it doesn't point straight up, it can't be fully
> symmetrical, as one side will be longer than the other.

Is there something in the text that states the mountains are symetrical? On 
Earth, at the peaks of mountains it is not uncommon for onside to be sheer 
and the other side to slope.

J

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net