Wolfean theologies

Matthew King · 05 Feb 2009, 04:19 · from 2009-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: automatthew at gmail.com (Matthew King)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:19:01 -0600
Subject: (urth) Wolfean theologies
In-Reply-To: <e815e3c90902041953l30c5cf30ufc06d33945a68def at mail.gmail.com>
References: <208634.96534.qm at web59603.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
	<08685A67-7D57-4D71-BB71-A58BCFC39560 at butcherbaker.org>
	<e815e3c90902041953l30c5cf30ufc06d33945a68def at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cdbc18280902042019x4e79e97cyee5459615c269881 at mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Matthew Weber <palaeologos at gmail.com> wrote:
> First off : clerical sexual abuse is not confined to the  RCC.  If it is
> more prevalent in the Roman Church (which may or may not be true), it might
> have more to do with the discipline of celibacy attracting men with
> sexuality issues than it has with the difference between single or double
> procession.

Ephebophilia is quite far removed from pedophilia, and conflating them
does no one any good.

Matthew
(Not RC, BTW, FWIW)

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net