Wolfean theologies

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 05 Feb 2009, 20:06 · from 2009-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:06:10 -0800
Subject: (urth) Wolfean theologies
In-Reply-To: <20090205195934.GL5021 at broggs.org>
References: <W528882320159921233854263@webmail13>
	<1f7617370902050950j7b833c63t8372125eec90a15d at mail.gmail.com>
	<20090205195934.GL5021 at broggs.org>
Message-ID: <1f7617370902051206k40d0e693lc1921b5ec312f298 at mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Jeffrey Brent McBeth <mcbeth at broggs.org> wrote:

> Rotates may be a better term than inverts, due to each corner having
> its identity :)

True -- and "invert" seems gravitically-bound, which would not be
applicable to a Being outside of spacetime. Also, the three "vertices"
are coequal, so it doesn't matter which way is "up."

But we digress.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net