Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Indescribable Christ?

John Watkins · 06 Feb 2009, 11:59 · from 2009-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:59:53 -0500
Subject: (urth) Indescribable Christ?
In-Reply-To: <498C012B.70209 at io.com>
References: <mailman.3547.1233721738.6116.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
	<4989BFB3.1050105 at verizon.net> <1661202702.20090204204405 at poczta.fm>
	<498C012B.70209 at io.com>
Message-ID: <93d4039f0902060359q70991da2v30d83c6dcbb5334f at mail.gmail.com>

No doubt Stanislaus meant that Christ's divine nature is in this sense
unknowable.  As Jeff observes, part of the point of Christianity is
that Christ is not simply divine, but possesses two natures. Christ's
human nature, in and of itself, is as describable as any other human
nature.



On 2/6/09, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> wrote:
> Stanislaus B. wrote:
>> God is categorically different from all other things which exists
>> (including gods/divinities/godlings/angels/saints). God is the
>> fundamental ground of all existence, outside the world, space and
>> time. Whatever exists, exists because of God. Moreover, no words
>> which can be used to describe any other things can be rightly used
>> about God. In fact, saying that God exists, is good, wise, powerful
>> etc is in a sense untrue - all those words do not describe God
>> correctly.
>>
>> For that reason saying that Severian is Christ makes no sense. Even
>> saying that Severian resembles Christ is meaningless if you do not
>> understand that categorical difference.
>
> I don't see how this indescribability can extend to Christ; isn't the
> whole point of Christianity that Christ is the personally accessible
> part of the Deity?
>
> --
> Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
> < http://www.io.com/~jwilson >
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net