Wolfean theologies

Son of Witz · 07 Feb 2009, 21:32 · from 2009-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz)
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:32:18 -0800
Subject: (urth) Wolfean theologies
In-Reply-To: <COL114-W310AE08B3EE0FF892E114688BE0 at phx.gbl>
References: <mailman.5088.1233834647.6116.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
	<498B5835.50805 at verizon.net>
	<COL114-W310AE08B3EE0FF892E114688BE0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <644F62F0-D384-4F07-92FD-CB49E43FA199 at butcherbaker.org>


On Feb 7, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Bob Miller wrote:

> > I should add that I'm not responding to the other Matthew, but to
> > those who attack the Roman Catholic church. I'll go even farther  
> than
> > he did and say that the discipline of celibacy is not at fault here,
> > but rather the positive and pronounced efforts of some American  
> Roman
> > Catholic priests to recruit men afflicted with sexual attraction to
> > other men. It is also hardly secret that many seminaries harass and
> > discourage men who do not play along.
> >


This is not something I was aware of.

thanks.
you know, it's good sometimes to blurt out your perceptions and  
misconceptions in public, because people are often forced to educate  
you.
I suppose celibacy isn't really to blame. though I do think repressing  
our sexual energies usually does more harm than good.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net