Ship Volant

Son of Witz · 18 Feb 2009, 16:52 · from 2009-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:52:47 +0000
Subject: (urth) Ship Volant
Message-ID: <W7572212138248621234975967@webmail1>

Thanks. This is all really helpful.
Since I always pictured a masted ship, and Tzadkiel's reinforces that concept, I suppose I'll go with a Ship under full sail, at an upward angle.

It's interesting to see the different responses. I guess I shouldn't be surprised to hear that some folks picture a rocket ship.
Makes it clear to me that while I might try to satisfy the text, it would be very hard to arrive at some consensus image.

Dang. I'm surprised how much I'm enjoying reading this book again. Even more than the second read. nuts.

~Witz

>-----Original Message-----
>From: matthew at calmeilles.co.uk [mailto:matthew at calmeilles.co.uk]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 01:08 AM
>To: 'The Urth Mailing List'
>Subject: Re: (urth) Ship Volant
>
>jwilson at io.com wrote:
>> in the web references I saw, the Heraldric(?) uses of the term indicates
>> flying, and usually shows wings. and then with the description of the coin 
>> "flying ship" it would seem to indicate, at a glance, that this ship is 
>> in flight, in both bas-relief images, blazon and coin.  hmm.  How the heck
>> can one make a ship look like it's flying without wings?  confounding! 
>
>There are several deliberate ambiguities here.
>
>First in heraldry a navire volant is a ship under full sail, those sails bellied by the wind.  So the description of the coin and other instances can be read in an entirely conventional manner if you just have that small bit of knowledge.
>
>Second Severian throughout the narrative makes little distinction between a ship of the conventional water going type and a ship of space such as the craft that hovers above Baldander's tower.  So here too is an interpretation of "flying ship" that might not really surprise the reader.
>
>Third - and this is something that is perhaps not made really explicit until Urth I think although either Hethor or Jonas allude to them - space, time and universe spanning ships, maybe only one ship, such as that on which Severian travels really do have keels, masts, sails and all the other appurtenances of an ocean going vessel.  So a ship flying through the air or space with the mirror sails of high technology (indistinguishable from magic as AC Clarke's famous aphorism has it) is quite conceivable.
>
>I'm curious to know why these successive constructions are presented and my guess is that at least one reason (not to say there aren't several others intended concurrently) is to ease the reader into the suspension of disbelief that allows Tadzekiel's ship to literally sail through space and time.
>
>Matthew
>
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net