Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Digest urth.v018.n014

Jon Camfield · 04 Sep 1998, 09:49 · from urth-v0018.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: GriffJon at mail.utexas.edu (Jon Camfield)
Subject: (urth) Re: Digest urth.v018.n014
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 09:49:39
Message-ID: <urth-v0018-0104 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0018/0104.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


>Tony Ellis wrote:
>The relevant quote is in the final chapter of Urth (Chapter LI), where
>Severian is chatting with his priest. He remembers the young officer
>reporting that Hierodules had landed a man and woman on the grounds of
>the House Absolute: "Remembering that, it was simple enough to guess who
>my priest's forbears had been - the sailors routed by my memories had
>paid for their defeat with their pasts, just as I would have lost the
>future of my descendants had my own past been defeated."
>
>"my descendants" seems pretty unequivocal here.

I had always taken this to show Sev believed that the sailors (Gunnie, etc.)
were the Adams and Eves of Ushas, though looking again, hm.

Another one of Wolfe's highly compacted sentences--
The part of the sentence up to the dash lead the reader to expect the next
part to reveal the ID of the Adam and Eve pair.

But the second half.... It seems to be a statement of his memory, which does
not ID the pair.  Continuing unpacking, the sailors section is about the
past 'as it happened', in other words, the sailors lost their chance.  The
descendants section, however, is prefaced by a 'would'.  We can interpret
this as "could have, but did not, in fact, the opposite happened".  This
leads to Tony Ellis' view.
However, Sev never mentioned having any children, By Valeria or otherwise,
and as Apheta wasn't human I doubt that that would be the source (though
perhaps their union provides a Jahi figure?).  Maybe Gunnie (the only sailor
who protected him) had a child by Sev...  Or perhaps Sev had children with
Valeria and just didn't remember(jk) to tell us about them....  The idea I'm
pursuing here is that 'descendants' doesn't have to be literal, or (if
literal) to mean descendants engendered on the Yesod trip.

Perhaps the Hieros only acted as an Ark for survivors in other parts of Urth
(did Apu ever have children??)

I remain unconvinced of either argument, that it is the sailors or that it
is Sev's children...
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Camfield      "GriffJon"  |Webmaster, Plan II Honors Program:
griffjon at ccwf.cc.utexas.edu   | www.dla.utexas.edu/~plan2
GriffJon at mail.utexas.edu      |Webmaster, Broccoli Project:
                              | www.utexas.edu/students/brocproj
Homepage, Gallery, Resume:    |Channel Manager, Undernet #Poetry
 ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~griffjon | www.tripod.com/~ircpoetry
------------------------------------------------------------------
"The most incomprehensible fact about nature is that it is comprehensible"
-- Albert Einstein


*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net