BSG Spoiler

brunians at brunians.org · 17 Mar 2009, 03:48 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) BSG Spoiler
In-Reply-To: <8FBE9D02-8F3F-4F3E-921C-B35C257F9E0A at io.com>
References: <W447681238525221237244914@webmail21>
	<6766.67.142.130.43.1237248642.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<AA496233-0862-4187-8D8A-EF77ED1347E8 at butcherbaker.org>
	<8FBE9D02-8F3F-4F3E-921C-B35C257F9E0A at io.com>
Message-ID: <2605.67.142.130.41.1237261735.squirrel at brunians.org>

Hold on. Isn't kneejerk politics Moore's main lens? How is it unfair to
turn the man's instrument on himself?




.

> On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Son of Witz wrote:
>>
>> wow. thanks for the hot tip.
>> is kneejerk politics the only lens to observe Alan Moore's work with?
>
> "Silk Spectre" sounds sort of like "Seawrack" if you're even drunker.
>
> Adam_______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net