The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
John Watkins · 17 Mar 2009, 15:30
· from 2009-March.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:30:19 -0400 Subject: (urth) The Politics Of Gene Wolfe In-Reply-To: <35EF45C035F648438CB89586E5313EDA@eMachinePC> References: <W447681238525221237244914@webmail21> <49BF4515.6080806 at io.com> <03FEB8E1-A5CB-4C35-B788-FF0B30DD9AD3 at goosemoon.org> <49BF7768.6000407 at io.com> <11930.72.171.0.143.1237286160.squirrel at brunians.org> <7D7361FF-F396-4C21-AB80-4B18585C708C at io.com> <93d4039f0903170724w1424e52cn7998812102dbee6b at mail.gmail.com> <2B8C663FAC9D4D39A0D4521DABA89887@eMachinePC> <93d4039f0903170812t7633f227ne0d2a5790e396da7 at mail.gmail.com> <35EF45C035F648438CB89586E5313EDA@eMachinePC> Message-ID: <93d4039f0903170830p1b74467cs4b308e535e7812e9 at mail.gmail.com> I'm well-acquainted with the Fourteenth Amendment, trust me. It's still a historical compromise that promoted a strong central government over the states. Most people, including myself, would agree, I think, that it was necessary and I agree with you that it is distinguishable from later expansions of federal power. On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:26 AM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote: > >James, we don't disagree. > >As it sits in today's political balance, however, with all the > compromises > >of history that have led us to this point > >(including the cases you refer to and the Fourteenth Amendment), > >I think that DC v. Heller was just about on-target. > > Not to nit-pick, John, but the 14th amendment was an actual amendment to > the constitution. It explicitly altered the rights of the states to make > laws in very limited areas. It was possibly the last time we resolved a > constitutional crisis "by the rules" (at the national level at least). > > J > > > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20090317/a26e27fd/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net