The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
brunians at brunians.org · 17 Mar 2009, 17:03
· from 2009-March.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:03:55 -0400 (EDT) Subject: (urth) The Politics Of Gene Wolfe In-Reply-To: <1f7617370903170825q9eab45fseb339ff294446f2f at mail.gmail.com> References: <W447681238525221237244914@webmail21> <B2156387-2C0B-41C8-A692-569C229615F0 at butcherbaker.org> <49BF4515.6080806 at io.com> <03FEB8E1-A5CB-4C35-B788-FF0B30DD9AD3 at goosemoon.org> <49BF7768.6000407 at io.com> <11930.72.171.0.143.1237286160.squirrel at brunians.org> <7D7361FF-F396-4C21-AB80-4B18585C708C at io.com> <93d4039f0903170724w1424e52cn7998812102dbee6b at mail.gmail.com> <2B8C663FAC9D4D39A0D4521DABA89887@eMachinePC> <6612.67.142.130.27.1237303208.squirrel at brunians.org> <1f7617370903170825q9eab45fseb339ff294446f2f at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4020.67.142.130.19.1237309435.squirrel at brunians.org> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, <brunians at brunians.org> wrote: > >> The intent of the second amendment is to allow the citizenry to more >> readily defend themselves against the government, when this becomes >> necessary, as it inevitably does. > > This is a common myth. This is a Big Lie, that you are repeating. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie The debate recorded in 'The Federalist Papers' and 'The Anti-Federalist Papers', and usage of the term militia at the time clearly show the opposite of what you say. This lie has been refuted time and time again, but like the proper Big Lie that it is, continues to be repeated. http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/quotes/arms.html http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=1266 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution > In fact, the Second Amendment is the only one > of the Ten that clearly states its purpose -- which is that a well-ordered > militia is essential for "security" of the state. In other words, it isn't > about opposing the government; it's about having the ability to repel > invaders on the spur of the moment. Secondarily. Its primary purpose is as I have stated, as my sources reflect. I note that you do not confute me, you merely state that I am wrong. For shame, Dan'l. Please do provide any evidence you might have to support your position. > I myself am deeply conflicted about the Second Amendment. It seems > clear to me that the free access to guns we have now is causing a > huge wave of homicides. Why? Because there have been many prominent and lurid stories in the news media? > But, while I have no desire to own a gun > myself, I insist on the *right* to own one. What exactly does this mean? If you chose to exercise you right - let us assume that you needed to, that there were scary people after your family and the police had already informed you that there was nothng that you could do - how hard would it be for you do to arm yourself without going out onto the black market? > Meanwhile, this is becoming less and less about Wolfe's politics and > more and more a discussion of our politics. Does anyone have any > strong sense of where Wolfe stands on the tarriff issue? He doesn't mention that prominently in almost every story. I would imagine that it is less important to him than the right to keep and bear arms and the right to be secure in the possession of one's property, both of which get mentioned frequently. .
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net