The Politics Of Gene Wolfe

Jeff Wilson · 18 Mar 2009, 00:44 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:44:04 -0500
Subject: (urth) The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
In-Reply-To: <964416.59898.qm at web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <W447681238525221237244914@webmail21>	<B2156387-2C0B-41C8-A692-569C229615F0 at butcherbaker.org>	<49BF4515.6080806 at io.com>	<03FEB8E1-A5CB-4C35-B788-FF0B30DD9AD3 at goosemoon.org>	<49BF7768.6000407 at io.com>	<11930.72.171.0.143.1237286160.squirrel at brunians.org>	<7D7361FF-F396-4C21-AB80-4B18585C708C at io.com>	<93d4039f0903170724w1424e52cn7998812102dbee6b at mail.gmail.com>	<2B8C663FAC9D4D39A0D4521DABA89887@eMachinePC>	<6612.67.142.130.27.1237303208.squirrel at brunians.org>	<1f7617370903170825q9eab45fseb339ff294446f2f at mail.gmail.com>
	<964416.59898.qm at web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <49C043D4.6000403 at io.com>

Craig Brewer wrote:
> One more non-Wolfe point. I agree with Dan'l about the correct reading of the 2nd Amendment and always have.
> 
> But even if it were for us to defend ourselves from the government,
> it has always seemed odd to me to apply that argument in an age when
> the weapons available to a massive governmental body aren't available
> to private individuals. I mean, even if we all bonded together in a
> big militia with big automatic weapons, would we stand a chance
> against an air force, a navy with its increasingly sophisticated
> robotic drone technology, chemical/bio/nuclear weapons, etc.? 

Probably not, but there's no danger of a united militia, and equally 
little danger of the armed forces uniting behind a commander in chief 
who would advocate nuking or anthraxing American soil. They might get 
away with gassing under martial law, but there's no practical way to 
defend all arms of the federal government from anyone who might take up 
arms against them.

The combined armed forces can't prevent popular militias from doing away 
with most of the federal marshals, BATF, DEA, FBI, and other offensive 
federal assets in the field. There's also the question of how to pay to 
keep the armed forces in supply and un-sabotaged during a civil war.

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
< http://www.io.com/~jwilson >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net