Father Inire's photo album

Dan Parmenter · 08 Sep 1998, 10:30 · from urth-v0018.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Dan Parmenter <dan at lec.com>
Subject: (urth) Father Inire's photo album
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 10:30:42
Message-ID: <urth-v0018-0123 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0018/0123.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From: "William H. Ansley" <wansley at warwick.net>

Mantis>> Happily, Inire seems to be just enamoured by little exultantesses,=
 and there
Mantis>> is no evidence of his actually molesting them. Boy, wouldn't that =
be an
Mantis>> embarassment to the reign of the Autarch Severian.

>I certainly hope no one reading this list thinks that Charles Lutwidge
>Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) molested any children. He didn't. He also wasn't a
>child pornographer - mantis was joking (I hope).

I guess it depends on how you define "pornography".  Dodgson
definitely took pictures of naked little girls.  This is not a
controversial assertion as far as I know, and this is what Mantis was
talking about.

D

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net