An Actual Wolfe Question

Son of Witz · 18 Mar 2009, 18:46 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:46:33 +0000
Subject: (urth) An Actual Wolfe Question
Message-ID: <W1886212587401237401993@webmail27>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Thornton [mailto:adam at io.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:39 AM
>To: 'The Urth Mailing List'
>Subject: Re: (urth) An Actual Wolfe Question
>
>
>On Mar 18, 2009, at 1:37 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote:
>
>>
>> There's these pre-adolescent girl scat S&M scenes which some people  
>> might
>> find erotic. Not that I want to hang around any of those people.
>
>To be fair, the pedophilia and the scat S&M scenes are actually two  
>DIFFERENT ones.
>
>Not, I suppose, that I'm doing a good job of selling _GR_.
>
>Adam

haha.
yeah, I was unclear if the pre-adolescent scat s&m was a pro or con.
extreme perversion in lit: I like it in Burroughs, I like it in Bataille, but I've seen no reason to read De Sade.
~witz

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net