Seawrack/ mother plot / + three whorls

Matthew Groves · 19 Mar 2009, 02:06 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: matthewalangroves at gmail.com (Matthew Groves)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:06:07 -0500
Subject: (urth) Seawrack/ mother plot / + three whorls
In-Reply-To: <ADB6DF95D327431A8F9492435135C258@eMachinePC>
References: <W1966531599119001237420034@webmail6>
	<80690B4EB4234E3F8F7ABF482DBCF88B@eMachinePC>
	<39ed084f0903181846v52792ec6q5d73306c83eaeca0 at mail.gmail.com>
	<ADB6DF95D327431A8F9492435135C258@eMachinePC>
Message-ID: <39ed084f0903181906l1561bcacq7d34f7b5af8d44c9 at mail.gmail.com>

Yeah, but i seem to remember a much more succinct post on the old list
about the thematic argument, without so much of the hard-sf defense of
the idea, which does less to convince me than just the idea of return
being important.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's here:
> http://www.urth.org/whorlmap/chras-writers/default.htm

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net