Babbie
John Watkins · 19 Mar 2009, 13:54
· from 2009-March.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:54:30 -0400 Subject: (urth) Babbie In-Reply-To: <49C22FFF.1050301 at verizon.net> References: <mailman.8203.1237439206.18432.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net> <49C22FFF.1050301 at verizon.net> Message-ID: <93d4039f0903190654p11fd2b42ge04c4adb1ccce5ee at mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:43 AM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net>wrote: > > Thus, even the dead ends are not really "dead" just as the gods and their > myths are not really "false," and since the "traps and snares" I referred to > (Milton) are always set by the Devil, who apparently has no presence in > Wolfe (or if he does he works for the Increate), they don't exist. It's an > interesting contrast with Protestantism---and Satan-obsessed Catholicism? > > I think the Devil does exist in Wolfe's work. He's portrayed pretty directly in Wizard Knight, for example, and I'm not sure we're supposed to think that there's anything redeemable about the Squid God and his ilk. That said, I do think that Wolfe flirts with the Origenism we see in George MacDonald and, to a lesser extent, C.S. Lewis. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:02:29 -0700 (PDT) > From: Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: (urth) Babbie > To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> > Message-ID: <176065.18290.qm at web37605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > David, that's a really interesting reading. I tend to think that Wolfe is > more ambiguous. It's not all good, and, in fact, the way I see it, most of > his stories are about the never-ending problems of figuring out the dead > ends from the good made up stuff. Otherwise, why wouldn't Severian be fine > believing in the Claw? Or why would Silk have to have the Outsider help him > see through Pas? Or why would Able have to be forced to look up to Michael > instead of down to Disiri, etc.? > > I think you're right that, in the end, all the "false gods" seem to be able > to be integrated, but it takes his heroes a lot of time figuring out how to > do it properly without following divergent paths. > > > > --- > avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. > Virus Database (VPS): 090318-0, 03/18/2009 > Tested on: 3/19/2009 7:44:00 AM > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. > http://www.avast.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20090319/e11c0d26/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net