The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
Tim Walters · 19 Mar 2009, 15:37
· from 2009-March.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: walters at doubtfulpalace.com (Tim Walters) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:37:24 -0700 Subject: (urth) The Politics Of Gene Wolfe In-Reply-To: <49C231EB.4050204 at io.com> References: <722494.42734.qm at web32401.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <11050.67.142.130.31.1237358936.squirrel at brunians.org> <49C0AEA8.50408 at doubtfulpalace.com> <49C0B1A8.60704 at io.com> <49C0B2B9.4060309 at doubtfulpalace.com> <49C0CC3A.3040509 at io.com> <49C10C93.5050103 at doubtfulpalace.com> <49C231EB.4050204 at io.com> Message-ID: <49C266B4.7080701 at doubtfulpalace.com> Jeff Wilson wrote: > then "Less than half the per capita gun ownership of the U.S." can't be > true Guns per capita, U.S.: 0.9 (my original link, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_countries_by_gun_ownership) Guns per capita, Switzerland, including Army guns in private homes: 0.4 (high figure from your link) Guns per capita, Switzerland, presumably including Army guns in private homes: 0.46 (from my original link again--slightly more than half, my bad) What part of this can't be true? Maybe you're thinking of "gun owners per capita" rather than "guns per capita"? The former would also be interesting info, but I don't know if anyone's measured it, and I don't have time to look right now. -- Tim Walters | The Doubtful Palace | http://doubtfulpalace.com
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net