BSG Spoiler

James Wynn · 21 Mar 2009, 14:42 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:42:27 -0500
Subject: (urth) BSG Spoiler
References: <W85788332174731237308642@webmail43>
Message-ID: <672C2051E9384B4B8E9EE654B29CB711@eMachinePC>

> Witz: You know, I was disappointed at the fact that
>Katie Sackhoff came across like a bimbo.  Dang. What a wilter.

>Stuart Hamm: Most of them seemed to be revealed
>as self absorbed LA actors

Well, Witz.

They didn't really explain any of the big mysteries here except one:

"Did the writers have any idea what were the answers to the puzzles and 
weirdo-visions they've
been posing over the last 4 years?"

"no"

(Also it's 3 hours were padded with at least an hour and a half of 
self-indulgent "Grey's Anatomy" gunk. My wife said "What happened to 
Starbuck? All they've got here is Katie Sackhoff".)

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net