Gnosticism in BotNS
David Stockhoff · 09 Apr 2009, 17:46
· from 2009-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:46:32 -0400 Subject: (urth) Gnosticism in BotNS In-Reply-To: <mailman.10625.1239291967.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net> References: <mailman.10625.1239291967.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net> Message-ID: <49DE3478.1020200 at verizon.net> The clarification is not inappropriate. Although I'm not sure where the idea comes from that people think Zoroastrianism is dualistic. Most people have never heard of it. "Manichaean," however, is a synonym for "dualistic." Manichaeism (Manichean Zoroastrianism) was at least as common as traditional Zoroastrianism by Roman times and was famously dualistic, and was a strong influence on early Christianity and the Christian gnostics, just as non-gnostic and non-dualistic Zoroastrianism was earlier an influence on Judaism. That was my point. Traditional Zoroastrianism itself has nothing to do with the topic. Lane's clarification is even more apropos. I had no idea I had stumbled into a hotbed of non-Christian religionologists. I won't dumb it down nest time. But I have used "gnosticism" in the very general layman's sense reflected in Lane's comment that Wolfe pirated a number of obscure beliefs. A number of beliefs may be described as "gnostic." It is impossible to characterize gnosticism as a uniform belief system, and I don't intend to try. (Nor am I only interested in Christian gnosticism.) I think it's more useful to refer to a set of beliefs, motifs, images, and symbols as "gnostic" and leave it at that. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:08:10 -0400 (EDT) From: brunians at brunians.org Subject: Re: (urth) Gnosticism in BotNS To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Message-ID: <10678.67.142.130.16.1239232090.squirrel at brunians.org> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Gnosticism was influenced by Zoroastrianism, which is Manichaean, so it's > > certainly dualistic. > This is a popular idea, but not a true one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism Zoroastrianism is, in fact, the oldest of what are called the monotheistic religions. Wolfe is aware of this. Latro is a sworn follower of the Great King who is (not coincidentally) a follower of the One True God. This, of course, has nothing to do at all with the discussion of gnosticism in the BotNS. --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090409-0, 04/09/2009 Tested on: 4/9/2009 1:46:34 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net