Wolfe in decline?

brunians at brunians.org · 15 Apr 2009, 12:26 · from 2009-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:26:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) Wolfe in decline?
In-Reply-To: <1846.72.171.0.143.1239798161.squirrel at brunians.org>
References: <mailman.16094.1239726601.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
	<FDDFE864-E0DB-474F-9F9C-BDD6BECF5AE8 at phyast.nhn.ou.edu>
	<37bfbeb60904141031w5120359ahb65faf6c7a6db35d at mail.gmail.com>
	<20090415115316.E68214800A at diego.dreamhost.com>
	<1846.72.171.0.143.1239798161.squirrel at brunians.org>
Message-ID: <2529.72.171.0.143.1239798389.squirrel at brunians.org>


> So what is going on here? Gideon is doing magick: he is programming
> himself to believe certain things which he does not actually believe, but
> which he must appear to believe to that the daemon that he has evoked so
> that that daemon will behave in the ways he wants her to behave.

s/to believe to that the/to believe to the/

a bit of overediting, sorry.





.

>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>> At 18:31 14/04/2009, Jonathan Goodwin wrote:
>>>I also then thought that I would never even have
>>>considered such a baroque interpretation in a work by another writer
>>>(and would have indeed set the book down long before finishing it).
>>>That kind of reaction, if shared by anyone here at all, is what I'm
>>>particularly interested in hearing about.
>>
>>
>> I had this reaction with AEG: the feeling "But this is Wolfe! Surely
>> there must be more to it than this!" Particularly as it had been
>> billed on Lovecraftian-horror elements which didn't really appear to
>> be present in any significant way.
>>
>> There are quite a few of the earlier works that I didn't fully 'get'
>> at the first time of reading, so that bred in me the suspicion that
>> if I didn't make much of a work, there probably was something clever
>> going on that I hadn't picked up on. But those are recognizable by
>> the "ah, of course" sensation when you do eventually spot it, or see
>> it explained by someone else. I have had no such sensation yet with AEG.
>>
>> best wishes,
>>
>> Mo
>>
>>
>> # ~ # ~ #
>>
>> WolfeWiki:
>> http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net