Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Urth Digest, Vol 56, Issue 37

James Wynn · 16 Apr 2009, 20:27 · from 2009-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:27:19 -0500
Subject: (urth) Urth Digest, Vol 56, Issue 37
In-Reply-To: <ccc836b60904161252p76a5c445k19d0fa106c2b9f1 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.19790.1239903967.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><49E7732A.7000300 at verizon.net>
	<ccc836b60904161252p76a5c445k19d0fa106c2b9f1 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <59BF7A3369564BAEAAC9546328A08A68@eMachinePC>

> Which short story of Wolfe's do you think would be the easiest to
> film, where some of the moral ambiguity and complexity of Wolfe could
> show through on screen?

Counting Cats in Zanzibar would receive as little or as much FX as one chose 
to receive and the story could be told in 15 minutes. The dialog could be 
converted directly to the adapted screenplay. It utilizes scifi concepts 
already well understood much of the audience, so very little exposition is 
necessary.

Perhaps a short scene could be added to dramatize the three laws of 
robotics.

J.

 


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net