Rajan vs Raja

James Wynn · 16 Apr 2009, 22:42 · from 2009-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:42:22 -0500
Subject: (urth) Rajan vs Raja
In-Reply-To: <273409710904161524i7ec9b05br56e60b800967fc15 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.19790.1239903967.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><1A1E3E2F0AA0465BA355C91FC14C392F@eMachinePC><93d4039f0904161341k4d71ff54vc4d30ac91580989c at mail.gmail.com><273409710904161346o308f8104w78d085d372899158 at mail.gmail.com><273409710904161346j4c119e25n6d75dcb42c9a81f at mail.gmail.com><C21E89454E2E42448C7359C3B470B4AE@eMachinePC><93d4039f0904161437s336ff23h49bf5e3d59f15e69 at mail.gmail.com><DD2A6E9653D245DEBDE47708C334C3FD@eMachinePC><93d4039f0904161451h1b558fcdu2edc6e65f3188ed3 at mail.gmail.com><BFC105E5CC124C898D7754E5E214EDAC@eMachinePC>
	<273409710904161524i7ec9b05br56e60b800967fc15 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BD44F0F54FBB4BBFA8C3ACBD43CBD380@eMachinePC>

>Well, I don't want you to back down,
>I just don't remember a single instance of Raja
>in the books.  Seems like if it was a valid conjugate,
>it would appear at least once.

I don't mind backing down about stuff I don't care much about. In Sanskrit 
"Raja" is the nominative tense. Just because I'm technically accurate 
doesn't mean I'm *textually* accurate. I didn't imagine it would make a 
difference to anyone but me.

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net